Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2003 DIGILAW 1393 (RAJ)
Lakhsingh v. State of Raj.
2003-10-13
KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL
body2003
Jheky] lnL; & ;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 86 jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ e.My ds ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 30-5-2000 dss fo:) izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj] tkYkkSj }kjk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 82 ds rgr fnukad 12-8-99 dks jktLo e.My esa jsQjsal izsf"kr djrs gq, xkao ujlkuk ds [kljk ua- 941 jdck 0-65 gSDVj] [kljk ua- 1178 jdck 0-95 gSDVj] [kljk ua- 1179 jdck 1-14 gSDVj ,oa [kljk ua- 1200 jdck 0-81 gSDVj dk 4@15 fgLls ds ckjs esa 16-1-96 dks dh xbZ uhykeh ,oa rglhynkj] Hkhueky }kjk tkjh fd;k x;k fodz; i= fnukad 15-3-96 dks fujLr djus ds fy;s jktLo e.My esa izsf"kr fd;k x;kA jsQjsal esa eq[; fcUnq ;g Fkk fd jktLFkku d`f"k lk[k izpyu ¼dfBukbZ;ksa dk fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1974 ds vUrxZr vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr dh jgu j[kh gqbZ Hkwfe dh uhykeh lo.kZ tkfr ds O;fDr ds gd esa dh tk ldrh gSA U;k;ky; us ;g fy[krs gq, fd mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 14¼2½ esa izko/kku gS blfy, fodz; xSj dkuwuh gS vkSj jsQjsal fnukad 30-5-2000 dks Lohdkj dj fy;kA mDr fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZ yk[kflag us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 86 vUrxZr utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= isk fd;kA 3- izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk eq[; rdZ gS fd jktLFkku d`f"k lk[k izpyu ¼dfBukbZ fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr cus fu;e 5 mi fu;e 14¼2½ dh vksj fnyk;k vkSj ;g dgk fd ;fn dksbZ _.k dh jkfk okf.kT; cSad ls ysus ds mijkUr mldk Hkqxrku ugha djrk gS rks ml O;fDr ds leLr LoRo lacaf/kr cSad vius fgr esa ys ysrk gS o bls fodz; dj ldrk gSA mUgksaus ;g Hkh dgk fd jkT; ljdkj us bl laca/k esa ifji= l-ia-5¼42½ jktLo@xzqi-4@80 fnukad 1-5-81 tkjh dj j[kk gSA izuxr ekeys esa fnukad 16-1-96 dks uhykeh dh xbZ ,oa fnukad 9-1-98 dks jkT; ljdkj us ifji= tkjh fd;k ftlls fnukad 1-5-81 dks ifji= dks okil fy;k ijUrq uhykeh fnukad 16-1-96 dks gqbZ bl dkj.k fnukad 16-1-96 dks cspku ij jksd ugha FkhA vr% utjlkuh ls Lohdkj fd;k tkosaA 4- fo}ku vfr- jktdh; vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS jktLFkku d`f"k lk[k izpyu ¼dfBukbZ-fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e dk viuk Lora= vfLrRo gS vkSj bl vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr cus fu;e ds vuqlj.k esa gh dk;Zokgh laHko gSA fu;eksa esa ;g Li"V mYys[k dj fn;k x;k gS fd vuqlwfpr tkfr dh Hkwfe dks dsoy vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr dks gh cSad fodz; dj ldrk gSA iqufoZpkj rHkh gksrk gS tcfd dksbZ Hkwy vFkok xyrh vknsk esa Li"V izrhr gksA 5- eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k ds dFkuksa ij euu fd;k o izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= ds rF;ksa dks i<+kA 6- ifji= fnukad 9-1-98 bl izdkj gS%& jktLFkku ljdkj jktLo ¼xzqi 6½ foHkkx dzekad i-5¼3½ jkt-4@86 fnukad 9-1-98 ifji= 1- leLr ftyk dysDVj] jktLFkkuA 2- leLr laHkkxh; vk;qDr] jktLFkkuA bl foHkkx ds ifji= dzekad i-5¼42½ jkt-4@80 fnukad 1-5-81 }kjk vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr ds O;fDr;ksa ds }kjk _.k ds ,ot esa vuqlwfpr cSad o ljdkjh lfefr;ksa dks ca/kd dh x;h mudh Hkwfe _.k pqdrk u fd;s tkus dh voLFkk esa cSad }kjk uhykeh djds mudh Hkwfe dks dzek% xSj vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr dks O;fDr;ksa dks cspus gsrq ¼jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 dh /kkjk 42 d esa ys½ nh x;h gSA jktLFkku d`f"k lk[k izpyu ¼dfBukbZ ,oa fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1976 ds fu;e 14¼2½ esa vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr dh Hkwfe dks cSad }kjk _.k dh ,ot esa xSj vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr dks cspus ij jksd gSA mDr ifji= fnukad 1-5-1981 mDr 1976 ds fu;e 14¼2½ ls fojks/k j[krk gSA vr% 1-5-81 dk ifji= okfil fy;k tkrk gSA kklu mi lfpo 7- jktLo e.My dh ,dyihB us mEesnflag ,.M vuknj cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku ,.M vuknj ¼1½ esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ^^;g iw.kZr% Li"V gS fd cSad vius _.k ds Hkqxrku u gksus dh fLFkfr esa _.knkrk ds LoRo dks vf/kxzfgr dj fodz; rks dj ldrk gS ijUrq ,slk fodz; dsoy mUgha O;fDr dks dj ldrk gS tks fd isks ls d`"kd gks muds ikl ,slh Hkwfe dks feykdj lhfyax ls vf/kd Hkwfe ugha curh gks vkSj ;fn Hkwfe fdlh vuqlwfpr tkfr ;k vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds O;fDr dh Fkh rks ,slh Hkwfe vuqlwfpr tkfr vFkok vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds O;fDr dks gh fodz; dh tkosxhA ;g izko/kku ck/;dkjh gS vkSj bl izko/kku ds jgrs gq;s ;fn ftyk dysDVj us uhykeh ls Hkwfe dk fodz; izkFkhZx.k ds fgr esa fd;k gS rks ,slk fodz; izkjEHk os gh kwU; izHkkoh gSA bu rF;ksa ij jkT; ljdkj ds jktLo ¼xqzi-4½ foHkkx us fnukad 1-5-1981 dks ,d ifji= fudkyk Fkk ftlesa ;g dgk x;k Fkk fd vuqlwfpr cSadksa }kjk lgdkjh lfefr;ksa ds ikl ca/kd j[kh Hkwfe ds _.kksa dk izfrlank; djus esa muds vlQy jgus dh nkk esa jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 dh /kkjk 42¼[k½ ds v/khu vUrj.k ij yxs fucZ/kuksa ds dkj.k mDr cSad rFkk lfefr;ksa vuqlwfpr tkfr@tu tkfr;ksa ds O;fDr;ksa ls fHkUu O;fDr;ksa dks Hkh uhykeh }kjk csp ldrs gSA ijUrq bl ifji= ds lanHkZ esa mUgksaus leLr ftyk dysDVjksa dks vius ifji= dzekad i-6¼14½ d`f"k@,l-,l@lh@77 fnukad 17-6-82 ls ,d vU; ifji= Hkh izsf"kr fd;k Fkk ftlesa ;g Li"V mYys[k dj fn;k x;k Fkk fd fnukad 15-6-81 dks tkjh ifji= lkekU; :i ls dkrdkjksa vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ekeyksa ds fy;s ykxw gksxkA jktLFkku d`f"k lk[k izpyu ¼dfBukbZ fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vius vki esa Lora= vf/kfu;e gksus ds dkj.k vkSj mlds varxZr cuk;s x;s fu;eksa ds fu;e 5 mi-fu;e ¼14½ esa fd;s x;s izko/kkuksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds O;fDr dh O;kolkf;d cSad }kjk vokIr dh xbZ Hkwfe dk fodz; ;fn fd;k tkrk gS rks mlds fy;s bl vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr cuk;s x;s fu;e 14 ds izko/kku ykxw ekus tk;saxsA bl n`f"V ls ;g Li"V gks x;k gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe ftldk fodz; izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa uhykeh ds }kjk vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr dh Hkwfe cSad }kjk vokIr gksus ds dkj.k fodz; izkjEHk ls izHkko kwU; gSA fo}ku mi [k.Mkf/kdkjh us Hkh blh vuq:i fu.kZ; fn;k gSA mudk fu.kZ; fof/k lEer gSa rFkk bl lanHkZ esa izlkfjr fu;eksa] mi fu;eksa ds vuqlkj gSA** 8- fu;fer mica/k ¼statutory provision½ dks dk;Zikfydk funsZk cukdj cnyk ugha tk ldrk vkSj ;fn dksbZ ifji= fudkyk tkrk gS tks vf/kfu;e ds fo:) gks rks Lor% gh kwU; gSA cSad dkrdkj dh Hkwfe csprs le; ekfyd ugha gks tkrk] mlds ikl ca/kdnkj ¼mortgagee½ ds vf/kdkj jgrs gSA Hkwfe] cSad ds _.k ls T;knk dher ij fcdrh gS rks og :i;k dkrdkj dks feyrk gSA bl rjg ls vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr ds dkrdkj dh Hkwfe csprs le; cSad] uhykedrkZ dh fLFkfr esa gksrk gS u fd ekfydA cSad esa lhfer vf/kdkj fufgr gksrs gSA vr% cSad ds }kjk uhykeh ls vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr dh Hkwfe ;fn lo.kZ tkfr ds O;fDr dks csph tkrh gS rks og kwU; gksrh gSA jktLFkku d`f"k _.k lafdz;k ¼dfBukbZ dk fujkdj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1974 dh /kkjk 14¼1½ bl izdkj gS%& ^^vpy lEifr dk vtZu djus rFkk O;;u djus ds fy, ,d cSad dk vf/kdkj & rRleFk izo`r fdlh fof/k vUrfoZ"V dh xbZ fdlh ckr ds gksrs gq, Hkh] ,d cSad ds ikl fdlh vU; vpy lEifr ;k d`f"k laca/kh Hkwfe ;k mlesa fgr dk vtZu Lo;a djus dh kfDr gksxh ftldks] mlds }kjk miHkksx dh xbZ fdlh fofRr; lgk;rk ds ckcr~ ,d d`"kd }kjk bldksa ikfjr fd;k x;k gS ;k ca/kd j[kk x;k gS] ijUrq dfFkr Hkwfe ;k mlesa fgr ;k fdlh vpy lEifr dks yksd-uhykeh }kjk csps tkus dh ekax dh xbZ gS vkSj dksbZ O;fDr ,d ,sls ewY; ds fy, ftldk dz; djus ds fy, izLrko ugha fd;k gS] tks bldks lans; /ku cSad dk Hkqxrku djus ds fy, i;kZIr ugha gksrk gSA** 9- blds flok; Hkh cSad }kjk vuqlwfpr tkfr ;k vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds O;fDr dh Hkwfe uhykeh }kjk lo.kZ tkfr ds O;fDr dks csph ugha tk ldrha jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 42¼b½ Lisky ykW gS tks vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds gdksa dks lqjf{kr djus ds fy, cuk;k x;k vr% cSad }kjk vuqlwfpr tkfr dh Hkwfe tks lo.kZ tkfr ds O;fDr dks csph xbZ gS] og voS/kkfud gSA 10- esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa e.My dk iwoZ vknsk mfpr ,oa fof/k lEer gSa rFkk vknsk esa dksbZ =qfV izrhr ugha gksrh gSA utjlkuh dk {ks= cgqr lhfer gSA r`rh; vihy ;k fuxjkuh ds :i esa iqufoZpkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;y; us Hkh ijlu nsoh cuke lqfe=k nsoh ¼2½] fofup; esa bl izdkj vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gSa fd%& ``It is well settled that review proceedings have to be strictly confined to the ambit and scope of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
In Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. vs. Govt of A.P. (3), this Court opened: ``What however, we are now concerned with is whether the statement in the order of September 1959 that the case did not involve any substantial question of law is an error apparent on the face of the record. The fact that on the earlier occasion the Court held on an identical state of facts that a substantial question of law arose would not per se be conclusive, for theearlier order itself might be erroneous. Similarly, even if the statement was wrong, it would not follow that it was an `errr apparent on the face of the record, for there is a distinction which is real, though it might not always be capable of exposition, between a mere erroneous decision and a decision which could be characterised as vitiated by error apparent. A review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected, but lies only for patent error. 11- QyLo:i izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA mDrkuqlkj ,dyihB dk fu.kZ; fnukad 30-05-2000 ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2003 DIGILAW 1393 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]