Judgment 1. The delay is condoned. 2. An advertisement was published inviting applications for appointment. The petitioner filed an application pursuant thereto, In the application he categorised himself to be 04 category i.e. extremely backward class. He was appointed provisionally. Subsequently it was detected that he belonged to 05 category, that is, backward class. The appointment was cancelled. Thus, the petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of cancellation of his appointment. 3. The writ petition was disposed of on 2.9.2002 directing that the petitioner was next man in the category and as such he be appointed. The aforesaid judgment and order have been impugned in this Lettes Patent Appeal. 4. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State to show that at the relevant time there were two categories i.e. extremely backward i.e. 04 class and backward class i.e. 05. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that since the respondent has suppressed the real fact, as such he is not entitled to be appointed. 5. Mr. Pradhan appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that there was a mistake in the application and it was not intentional. The respondent now be treated in 05 category in place of 04 which was mentioned in the application. It was either a mistake or intentional, the relevant document was not brought before the learned Judge which led to an erroneous conclusion. Moreover now the respondent is taking plea that it was a mistake. The admitted fact is that the respondent belonged to 05 category but in application he mentioned to be extremely backward class and as such no relief can be granted to him. 6. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.