Judgment 1. This petition has been filed against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 10 December, 2002. This order of the Central Administrative Tribunal is on O.A. No. 286 of 2002 upon a claim petition having been filed by Narsing Paswan against the Union of India and 11 others. 2. But for the integrity certificate which has been withheld, the contention of the titioner is that he would receive an allocation to IAS cadre. 3. The Tribunal has noticed three aspects on the claim petition of the petitioner. these are (a) The Vigilance department of the State of Bihar has said that one of the chrges against the petitioner is that during his posting as an Executive Engineer in jamshedpur, he was involved in misutilisation of funds meant for Rural Water Management and pay of the staff amounting to Rs. 40 lakh; (b) another charge of diversion of funds amounting to Rs. 9.37 lakh irregularly, and an inquiry into his acquiring assets disproportionate to his known source of income is pending and (c) a charge of illegal appointment of 40 persons including his relations. 4. Very strong reliance has been placed on a comment which has been recorded at the internal screening at its meeting on 31 August, 2001. As strong reliance has been placed which has a reference to the petitioner (Narsing Paswan at serial no. 33) this is reproduced. 5. By examining the order of the Tribunal which has been challenged and the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner it cannot be contended with any amount of connfidence that there is no vigilance matter pending against the petitioner or that the petitioner has a clean track of record so that this Court may certify that the Tribunal has been in error. The matters are still pending inquiry against the petitioner. 6. In the circumstances the Court can hardly certify that the Tribunal has commited an error in not interfering and granting reliefs prayed for by the petitioner. 7. Dismissed.