JUDGMENT 1. Heard the counsel for the Avas Vikas Parishad and Shri Daulat Ram Sidana in person. 2. The complainant Shri Daulat Ram had filed a petition No.154/99 for allotment of plot in his favour along with compensation. The learned Forum passed the following order: The complaint of the complainant is allowed. The opp. parties are directed to allot the plot to the complainant in Rudrapur in compliance with the allotment scheme of March 1987. In case of non-compliance of this order, the complainant shall be entitled to file the execution application. 3. It is said that the order was not complied. However, the Avas Vikas Parishad appears to have passed the allotment order on 10-04-2002 and it is said that it is in compliance of the order of the Forum. 4. The complainant was not satisfied with this allotment order and he applied for execution. The execution proceedings were going on. All of a sudden the District Forum passed an order on 06-012003. "We heard the parties. Allotment is being done according to Niyam. Therefore, the objection of the complainant is dismissed." 5. The order is a non-speaking order How the allotment is being done in accordance with Niyam is not clear: What Niyam have been followed and what Niyam have not been followed, has not been discussed. There were objections of the complainant. These objections were summarily rejected. What were the objections, why these objections were not sustainable has not been discussed in the order. 6. Since, the order is slip-shod and non-speaking order, without any reason, it is hereby set aside and the case is sent back to the learned Forum to decide the execution application afresh in the light of the observations made in the body of this order. Cost of this appeal shall be easy. ORDER 7. The order dated 06-01-2003 is hereby set aside. The case is sent back to the learned Forum to decide the execution application afresh in the light of the observations as made above. Cost of this appeal shall be easy.