JUDGMENT 1. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner u/Art. 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent (Urban Improvement Trust, Bikaner) may be directed to grant semi permanent status to the petitioners under the Public Works Department (B & R) including Garden, Irrigation, Water Work and Ayurvedic Department Work charged Employees Service Rules, 1964 from the date they completed two years of service with all consequential benefits. 2. The facts of the case as put forward by the petitioner are as under : That the petitioners were appointed on the post of Drafts-man/Surveyor by the Urban Improvement Trust, Bikaner (respondent) and they were serving in the respondent-Trust for last over three years at the time of filing of writ petition and, therefore, that being so, status of semi-permanent be given to them. Hence, this writ petition with the above mentioned prayer. 3. Reply to the writ petition was filed by the respondent and it was submitted by it, that because of mutual understanding amongst the petitioners and the respondent, the petitioners had already been given status of semi permanent vide order (Annex. R/1) and when this agreement was executed between them, an assurance was given by the petitioners that they would withdraw the writ petition. Since the relief claimed by the petitioners had already been given to them, the present writ petition has become infructuous and be dismissed as such. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted an affidavit filed by Shri Rajendra Singh (One of the petitioners) in which it has been stated that since relief has already been given to him, hence, he does not want to press this writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondent has further submitted that other two petitioners have also given the same affidavits. This fact has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. In view of the fact that the relief sought by the petitioners in this writ petition has already been granted to them, therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous and the same deserves to be dismissed as such. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed as having become to infructuous.No order as to costsWrit Petition Dismissed. *******