JUDGMENT 1. - This petitioner under Section 482 Cr.PC. filed by the complainant petitioner is directed against the order dated 12.11.02, whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2, Sikar, affirmed the order dated 10.7.02, by which the learned A.C.J.M. Sikar, dismissed the application of the complainant for giving ornaments and other articles on 'Supardiginama'. 2. The facts in brief are that the complainant submitted an F.I.R. at Police Station Kotwali, Sikar, regarding theft in his house in April, 1999. During investigation, three accused persons were arrested and a number of ornaments and other articles were recovered at their instance. After completion of the investigation, charge sheet came to be filed. Subsequently the accused persons absconded and the learned Magistrate recorded the statements of the witnesses as provided under Section 299 Cr.P.C. 3. Thereafter an application was moved on behalf of the complainant on 17.5.2002 with a prayer that the recovered articles may be given on 'Supardigi'. This application was dismissed on the ground that after arrest of the accused persons, these articles would be required for identification purposes during the trial. 4. This order was affirmed in Criminal Revision No. 46/2002. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant petitioner argued that a number of gold and silver ornaments and other articles were recovered upon information supplied by the accused persons under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act and now the accused persons are absconding, hence the complainant and other concerned witnesses, who may identify the articles before the trial court, may be re-examined on the point of identification of the recovered articles and thereafter an appropriate order regarding `supardiginama' may be passed. This prayer is not opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and appears to be genuine. 6. Consequently, this petition is allowed. Both the impugned order are set-aside and the learned A.C.J.M. Sikar, is directed to re-examine the complainant and other concerned witnesses regarding the identification of the recovered articles and after marking exhibit articles, he decide the execution application afresh in accordance with law with a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.Petition Allowed - Impugned Orders Set Aside. *******