JUDGMENT 1. - Today the matter comes upon the application filed under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India. Both the parties are agreed that this matter may be heard finally and disposed of at this stage. 2. The petitioner preferred this writ petition against the order dated 7.9.1996 passed by Additional Collector and order dated 10.5.2002 passed by Board of Revenue, Ajmer and also seek relief from this Court to restrain the respondents not to take electric connection and not to sell the property till final disposal of the suit pending before the Additional Collector, Sawaimadhopur. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents further submits that during the pendency of the civil suit, they are not going to alienate the property belonging to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no objection if the liberty is given by this Court for getting the electric connection in the name of temple premises, but so far as alienation is concerned, the respondents be restrained not alienate the property belonging to the temple till the final disposal of the suit pending before the Additional Collector, Sawai Madhopur. The preposition made by the petitioner is agreed by the respondents. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts, the respondents are directed not to alienate the property of the temple till the final disposal of the suit which is pending before the Additional Collector, Sawai Madhopur. The petitioner is also directed not to create any hindrance in the development of the temple. The Additional Collector, Sawai Madhopur is expected to pass the appropriate order in the civil suit as early as possible. 6. With these observations the writ petition stands disposed of.Petition Disposed of. *******