( 1 ) ISSUE notice. Mr. Ghose accepts notice. ( 2 ) ( 3 ) WITH the consent of the counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for final hearing. ( 4 ) IN so far as the merits of the matter are concerned, there is a finding that the respondent has completed 240 days. Record of attendance was not produced before the labour Court by the petitioner. The experience certificate being Ex. WW 1/6 is a documentary proof of service of respondent. Issued by the Assistant Registrar and attempt to disown the certificate cannot be countenanced as the Assistant Registrar of the University is a senior and responsible officer who is not expected to issue such certificates casually. There is no dispute that provisions of Sections 25f and 25g were not followed. In so far as the reinstatement of respondent is awarded, the award is therefore, unassailable and is accordingly upheld. In so far as the back wages are concerned, learned counsel states that the dispute was sought to be raised more than a year after the termination of service. Mr. Luthra has contended that in view of the delay in espousing the petitioner s cause 50% of back wages granted should not be upheld. ( 5 ) AFTER going into the matter and considering the merits of the dispute and delay in espousing the cause, the back wages should be reduced from 50% and now stands quantified at a figure of Rs. 15,000. 00 which shall be paid on or before 15th September, 2003. ( 6 ) THE respondent to report for service on 15th September, 2003 to the office of the registrar of the Petitioner. ( 7 ) THE Writ petition stands dispose of accordingly. Dasti.