JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Public Prosecutor. Perused the order impugned dated 10.4.2003 as also the case diary. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that they were preparing for dacoity. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that at this stage, it cannot be said that what act, they would have committed except that petitioner No. 1 was having sword and petitioner No. 2 was having lathi. 3. Upon consideration of over all facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of case, I think it proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 4. Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.PC. is allowed and petitioners (1) Himtia s/o Songia Kanjar and (2) Shantia s/o Harkia Kanjar be released on bail in FIR No. 84/2003 RS. Begun District Chittorgarh provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 30,000/- and furnishes one sound and solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.Bail application allowed. *******