JUDGMENT 1. This is an appeal by Prem Sagar Singh against the judgment and order dated 04.12.2002 passed by District Forum, Udham Singh Nagar, whereby the complaint of the appellant was dismissed. 2. This is a very confused complaint for nothing. It is alleged that the complainant has got a shop. It was insured from 26.04.2000 to 07.05.2000. The complainant was a tenant. The owner cut the internal wall, fixed the door and took possession of the shop. It is alleged that he had removed all the articles as well. The shop was insured from 26.04.2000 to 25.04.2001. It is alleged that trespass was made before a 07.05.2000 i.e., on 07.05.2000 the shop was in the possession of the owner. It is alleged that entire articles were removed. What was insured was the articles of the shop till 07.05.2000. On 09.05.2000 a sum of Rs. 320/- was credited towards insurance. Nothing was to be insured on that particular date because on 07.05.2000 the complainant has already lost his shop and his articles. When nothing was to be insured, the said amount was again credited in the account of the complainant on 03.11.2000. There is no allegation regarding any other deficiency of service. There is no provision that the bank should write of to the amount of loan which was taken by the complainant because his landlord has allegedly taken away all the articles of the shop. The petition is totally mis-conceived petition. It has rightly been dismissed by the learned Forum. The appeal has got no force and is accordingly dismissed. ORDER The appeal is, hereby, dismissed. However, cost of this appeal shall be easy.