Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2004 DIGILAW 1042 (SC)

VIMI MATHUR v. VIKAS MATHURS

2004-08-23

B.N.SRIKRISHNA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL

body2004
ORDER 1. IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT TWO OTHER CASES BETWEEN THE PARTIES ARE ALREADY PENDING IN THE COURTS AT PATNA, WE CONSIDER IT APPROPRIATE TO ALLOW THIS TRANSFER PETITION. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS ALSO HAS NO OBJECTION TO ADOPT SUCH A COURSE, HAVING REGARD TO THE FACT STATED ABOVE. 2. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE TRANSFER PETITION IS ALLOWED AND MATRIMONIAL CASE NO. 31 OF 2002, TITLED AS VIKAS MATHUR V. VIMI MATHUR, PENDING IN THE COURT OF VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GHAZIABAD, UTTAR PRADESH, SHALL STAND TRANSFERRED TO THE DISTRICT JUDGE, PATNA, BIHAR, WHO MAY EITHER HEAR THE CASE HIMSELF OR TRANSFER IT TO A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION. 3. NO COSTS.