Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2004 DIGILAW 1090 (RAJ)

Dala v. Deva

2004-08-02

A.K.PUROHIT, KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL

body2004
iqjksfgr] lnL;&;g f}rh; vihy /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ ds vUrxZr jktLO vihy izkf/kdkjh] Mwaxjiqj ds fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 2-8-2000 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZA 2- izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd orZeku vihykaV us ,d jktLo okn vUrxZr /kkjk 53] 88 dk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] Mwaxjiqj ds ;gka orZeku izkFkhZx.k ds fo:) izLrqr dj fookfnr vkjkth ds rdklesa ,oa [kkrsnkj ?kksf"kr djus dk fd;kA okn ntZ dj fo}ku mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] Mwaxjiqj us izfroknhx.k ds tokcnkos ds vk/kkj ij ikap rudh;kr dk;e dh rFkk ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij izR;sd rudh ij lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij viuk fu"d"kZ fudkyrs gq, vius fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 31-12-1999 }kjk vihyk.V dk okn Lohdkj fd;kA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds bl fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 31-12-1999 ds fo:) orZeku izR;FkhZx.k us jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh Mwaxjiqj ds le{k vihy izLrqr dh ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 2-8-2000 }kjk dj fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 31-12-1999 dks fujLr fd;kA jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh Mwaxjiqj ds mDr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 2-8-2000 ds fo:) orZeku vihyk.V oknh us ;g vihy izLrqr dh gSA 3- vihyk.V~l ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds okn dh lquokbZ dj rudh;kr dk;e dj ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{; ds vk/kkj ij muds i{k esa fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k ftlds fo:) izfroknhx.k@orZeku izR;FkhZx.k la[;k 1 ls 6 }kjk izLrqr vihy ij jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh us cxSj fdlh lk{; dk foospu fd;s vkSj cxSj fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk rudh;kr ij fn;s fu"d"kksZ ij vk/kkfjr fu.kZ; ij rudh Hkh foospu ,oa foys"k.k fd;s ljljh rkSj ij vihy Lohdkj dj muds i{k esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh dks fujLr fd;k gS] tks oS/kkfudrk ugha gSA blds vykok vihykUV~l ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us izdj.k ds xq.kkxq.k ij Hkh cgl dh gSA 4- fo}ku vf/koDrk jsLiks.MsUVl us jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh ds fu.kZ; dk tksjnkj kCnksa esa leFkZu djrs gq, bl fu.kZ; esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh voS/kkfudrk gksus ls bUdkj djrs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkxq.k ij cgl dh gSA 5- geus nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl lquh ,oa ml ij euu fd;k rFkk nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa dk rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 6- fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr okn esa mUgksaus okn i= ,oa tokcnkos ds vk/kkj ij ikap rudh;kr dk;e dh vkSj izR;sd rudh ij vyx vyx nLrkosth ,oa ekSf[kd lk{; dh foLr`r foospuk djrs gq, viuk fu"d"kZ izR;sd rudh ij nsrs gq, fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS tcfd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds fu.kZ; ds voyksdu ek= ls ik;k tkrk gS fd mUgksaus izdj.k ds rF;ksa rFkk mHk; i{kdkjksa dh nyhyksa dk vius fu.kZ; ds dqy pkj ist esa mYys[k fd;k gS ysfdu vius foospu ds ist uEcj 5 ij dsoy lk<+s ikap ykbuksa esa cgl ij euu dj i=koyh dk v/;;u dj orZeku jsLiks.MsUVl ¼tks ogka vihykaV~l Fks½ muds rdksZ ls lgefr trkrs gq, vihy Lohdkj dh gS ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh dks fujLr fd;k gS] mn~nr djuk mfpr le>rs gS] og bl izdkj gS%& ^^eSaus ;ksX; vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh esa isk nLrkostkr dk v/;;u fd;kA eSa ;ksX; vfHkHkk"kd vihyk.V~l ds mijksDr foospuksa ,oa muds rdksZ ls lger gksdj vihykUV~l dh vihy Lohdkj djrk gwa ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 31-12-1998 fujLr djrk gwaA fMØh eqfrZc gksA fu.kZ; ljs btykl lquk;k x;kA i=koyh QSly kqekj gksdj nkf[kr nrj gksA** bl fu.kZ; fnukad 2-8-2000 ds voyksdu ek= ls ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd fo}ku jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh us fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ds fo:) izLrqr vihy dks Lohdkj djrs le;] fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu"d"kksZ rFkk izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa oS/kkfudrk dh fdafpr ek= Hkh foospuk ugha dh vkSj vihy Lohdkj dj yhA vius fu.kZ; esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu"d"kksZ ls vlger gksus ds ckcr dksbZ dkj.k ugha fn;s vkSj u gh izdj.k esa ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{;ksa dh rfud Hkh foospuk djus dh tger mBkus dh dksfkk dh gSA bl fu.kZ; dks lhihlh ds vknsk 41 fu;e 31 ds lUnHkZ esa fof/kor ,oa U;kf;d fu.kZ; ugha dgk tk ldrkA vknsk 41 fu;e 31 lhihlh ds izko/kkuqlkj izFke vihy fu.kZ; ds fy, fofup; gsrq fcUnq fu/kkZfjr djsxh vkSj mu ij viuk fu.kZ; nsxh vFkok izR;sd okn fcUnq ij dkj.k lfgr fu"d"kZ fudkyrs gq, fu.kZ; ikfjr djsxhA izLrqr izdj.k esa izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; us fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk cuk;s x;s okn fcUnqvksa ij dksbZ foospuk fd;s cxSj gh fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; fujLr dj foijhr fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k tc fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ds foijhr fu.kZ; izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; ikfjr djrk gS rks izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; dk ;g drZO; gSk tkrk gS fd og izR;sd fcUnq ij ,oa lk{; rFkk rF;ksa dh foospuk djrs gq, fu.kZ; ikfjr djsaA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us fofup; e/kqdj o vU; cuke laxzke o vU; ¼1½] esa bl lEcU/k esa tks fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS] og bl izdkj gSa%& ``Civil Procedure Code, 1908-Section 96-Duty of the appellate Court defined-The impugned judgment in the first appeal, is singularly silent of any discussion either of documentary evidence or oral evidence. Not only that, we find that though Trial Court had dismissed the suit on ground of limitation as also on the ground that the decision in the earlier suit (OS No. 93/71) operated as resjudicata against defendant No. 1 only the High Court has not even considered, much less discussed, correctness of either of the two grounds on which the Trial Court had dismissed the suit. Sitting as a Court of first appeal, it was the duty of the High Court to deal with all the issues and the evidence led by the parties before recording its findings. It has failed to discharge the obligations placed on a first appellate Court. The judgment under appeal is so cryptic that none of the relevant aspects have even been noticed. The appeal has been decided in a very unsatisfactory manner. First appeal must address itself to all the issues of law and fact and decide it by giving reasons in support of the findings. jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us ^jk/kk eksgu ,oa vU; cuke jkesoj ,oa vU;* ¼2½] esa tks O;oLFkk nh gS og bl izdkj gS%& ``Code of Civil Procedure, Order 20, Rule 5, Order 41, Rule 31-Appeal against order of RAA-In a suit Trial Court framed as many as 9 issues and passed decree without analysing and without recording finding on every issue-Reasons recorded summarily by Trial Court-RAA reversed the order of Trial Court but RAA also neither determined any point to decide appeal nor analysed the issues framed by he Trial Court-Held, Trial Court was required to analyse and to record finding on every issue-While reversing the order RAA was also required to analyse the issues-Hence both the Courts below committed error-Orders of Courts below set aside and case remanded. mDr uthjksa esa nh xbZ O;oLFkk ds foijhr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us vius fu.kZ; ds ist ua- 5 esa ek= lk<+s ikap ykbZuksa esa muds lEeq[k vihyk.V~l ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk mBk;s x;s rdksZ ls lger gksuk izdV djrs gq, vihy Lohdkj dh gS rFkk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 31-12-1999 fujLr dj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS] tks fu.kZ; o fMØh lhihlh ds vknsk 41 fu;e 31 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqdwy ugha gSA 7- vr% izdj.k ds xq.kkxq.k ij nksuksa i{kdkjksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZa ij fdlh izdkj dh fVIi.kh djuk U;k;ksfpr ugha le>rs gq, ;g vihy vakr% Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dk fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 2-8-2000 fujLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj ;g izdj.k iqu% jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] Mqqaxjiqj dks bl funsZk ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd os muds le{k izLrqr orZeku jsLiks.MsUV dh vihy la[;k 7@2000] 4@2000 Jh nsok o vU; cuke Jh nyk o vU; dh iqu% lquokbZ dj fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj vihy ij viuk fu.kZ; ikfjr djsaA 8- mHk; i{kdkj jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] Mwaxjiqj ds le{k fnukad 13-9-2004 dks mifLFkr gksosaA 9- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA