JUDGMENT 1. - Mansharam & Kalyani, appellants stood sureties and executed surety bonds in sum of RS. 10,000/- for Sugreev, who was an accused alongwith co-accused persons for offences U/Ss. 392, 395, 307, IPC in Sess. Case No. 46/03 and was enlarged on bail. Pursuant to bail bonds accused Sugreev did not appear before the trial Court, thereby it resulted in an order by the trial Court for forfeiture of his personal bail bond and surety bonds, besides initiation of proceedings U/s. 446. Cr.PC. against the appellants & accused Sugreev, who subsequently surrendered before the trial Court on 23.10.03. 2. However, present appellants moved an application u/s. 446(3) Cr.RC. before trial Court praying for dropping the proceedings U/s. 446, Cr.PC, but the trial Court dismissed the same and issued warrants against the appellants for recovery of Rs. 10,000/-, vide order dated 30.5.03. Hence this appeal 3. Shri Rohan Jain submits that pursuant to recovery warrants, each of appellants has already submitted Rs 10,000/- as is apparent from order dated 27.9.03, but the trial Court failed to take a lenient view for dropping the proceedings U/s. 446, Cr.PC against the appellants. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed to the prayer for leniency, and supports the impugned order of trial court. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considered the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to-remit half of the recovery amount awarded by the trial court. 6. Consequently this appeal is partly allowed and recovery of Rs. 10,000/- against each of appellants is reduced to half, thereby Rs. 5,000/-against each of them be remitted and rest part of awarded recovery amount be enforced. To the above extent, the order dated 30.5.03 of Addl. Sess. Judge No. 2 (FT) Kota stands modified. The trial Court is directed to proceed as directed above.A copy of this order be sent to the court below forthwith.Appeal partly accepted. *******