Judgment :- P.D. Dinakaran, J. The exemption claimed by the petitioner under Section 3(B)(2)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") from the levy of sales-tax with respect to the transaction representing the inter-state works contract was rejected by the second respondent by order dated 6.1.2000 and the same was confirmed by the first respondent/Tribunal, by the impugned order dated 27.2.2001, incidentally, imposing penalty under Section 12(3)(b) of the Act. Hence the above writ petition for issue of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the files of the first respondent in T.C.No.79 of 2001, dated 27.2.2001 and to quash the same as being invalid and illegal. 2. Concededly, the works contract was completed in the State of Tamil Nadu and the transaction does not represent inter-state works contract. Even though the petitioner alleged that they purchased the goods outside the State of Tamil Nadu, it is not in dispute that the same has been utilised in the State of Tamil Nadu, which attracts a deemed sale and therefore, in our considered opinion, the claim of exemption sought for by the petitioner under Section 3(B)(2)(a) of the Act was rightly rejected by respondents 1 and 2. 3. Once the return submitted by the petitioner was made incorrectly, we do not find any illegality in imposing penalty under Section 12(3)(b) of the Act. The question of mens rea does not arise in such case as it is a statutory liability. Hence, the contention advanced on behalf of the petitioner challenging the impugned order fails. This writ petition is dismissed. No costs.