ORDER 1. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE, THE RESPONDENT IS NEITHER PRESENT NOR REPRESENTED. 2. THIS PETITION IS BY THE WIFE SEEKING TRANSFER OF HMA PETITION NO. 38/27 OF 2003 TITLED AS VIJAY KUMAR V. VEENA, PENDING IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, LAKSHMAN GARH, DISTRICT ALWAR, RAJASTHAN, TO THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, KAMAL, HARYANA, ON THE GROUNDS THAT THERE IS A LONG DISTANCE BETWEEN KAMAL AND LAKSHMAN GARH; THE PETITIONER HAS THREE MINOR CHILDREN; AND SHE HAS NO SUFFICIENT SOURCE OF INCOME TO ATTEND THE COURT PROCEEDINGS AT LAKSHMAN GARH. 3. HAVING REGARD TO THE GROUNDS STATED IN THE TRANSFER PETITION AND PARTICULARLY TAKING NOTE OF THE FACT THAT THE PETITIONER HAS NO SUFFICIENT MEANS TO TRAVEL TO LAKSHMAN GARH AND HAS THREE MINOR CHILDREN, WE THINK IT IS JUST AND APPROPRIATE TO ALLOW THIS TRANSFER PETITION. ACCORDINGLY, THE TRANSFER PETITION IS ALLOWED AND HMA PETITION NO. 38/27 OF 2003 TITLED AS VIJAY KUMAR V. VEENA, PENDING IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, LAKSHMAN GARH, DISTRICT ALWAR, RAJASTHAN, SHALL STAND TRANSFERRED TO THE DISTRICT JUDGE, KAMAL, HARYANA, WHO MAY EITHER HEAR THE CASE HIMSELF OR ASSIGN IT TO A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION. 4. NO COSTS.