Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2004 DIGILAW 150 (SC)

Ajay K. Agrawal v. Union of India

2004-02-03

S.H.KAPADIA, V.N.KHARE

body2004
JUDGMENT : Crl. M.P. No. 1281 of 2004: 1. Heard counsel for the applicant. 2. We clarify that the High Court of Bombay is not precluded from considering the Criminal Application No. 91 of 2004, pending before it. The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. Crl. M.P. No. 1280 of 2004: 3. Learned counsel seeks leave of the Court to withdraw this interlocutory application with liberty to file the same before the High Court. Order as prayed. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we direct that all the States shall supply the numbers and particulars of such cases, which the States want to be investigated through the C.B.I, within a period of two weeks. After the receipt of those particulars, the C.B.I. would file an affidavit indicating therein which cases they would like to investigate. 5. If there is something confidential that the State of Karnataka wants to part with the C.B.I, it can do so. 6. List all the matters after five weeks.