Judgment :- The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the judgement dated 7.6.2000 made in C.M.A.No.19 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode. 2. The revision petitioner as plaintiff challenged the order of the Arbitrator/Secretary, Industrial Labour Co-operative Society in Na.Ka.No.10520/1C-2/98 dated 23.1.1999 in A.R.C.No.18/98. As per the order, the claim of the revision petitioner under Section 90 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 was dismissed. 3. The revision petitioner borrowed amount for purchasing auto in the year 1995 from the respondent society. He moved the Arbitrator stating that he paid almost the loan amount and some of the payments made have not been deducted and also stating that the respondent society have committed malpractice in entering the account with regard to the payments made by the revision petitioner. In fact, he also challenged the penal interest collected from him. He also sought to pay the balance loan amount in instalment. 4. The Arbitrator after conducting enquiry, in which the evidence of the revision petitioner was recorded, rejected the claim and determined the amount payable by the revision petitioner. That order was challenged before the Principal District Court, Erode and the said order has been confirmed by the Principal District Court, Erode in C.M.A.No.19 of 1999. Therefore, the revision petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5. In this Civil Revision Petition, the same contentions, which have been urged before the Arbitrator, have been raised. The learned counsel for the respondent society contended that the revision petitioner moved the Arbitrator and the Arbitrator after recording the evidence of the revision petitioner has arrived the amount due by the revision petitioner, considering the amount paid by him with reference to the accounts maintained by the respondent Society. The learned counsel for the respondent society contended that the revision petitioner moved the Arbitrator and the Arbitrator after recording the evidence of the revision petitioner has arrived the amount due by the revision petitioner, considering the amount paid by him with reference to the accounts maintained by the respondent Society. As per the statement filed by the respondent society on 30.9.1998, subject matter of the Civil Revision Petition, the revision petitioner has paid Rs.41,102.80 towards principal, interest and penal interest and accordingly, the amount due and payable by the revision petitioner has been arrived at Rs.40,123/- towards principal and Rs.984/- towards interest and Rs.340.30 towards penal interest and even according to the revision petitioner, he had paid instalment dues for 2 years at the rate of Rs.420/- per week towards loan amount and as such, it is clear that he has to pay still the amount as claimed by the respondent society. 6. Though it is claimed that almost entire loan amount has been paid by the revision petitioner, he has not filed necessary R.C. Book before the Arbitrator, as such, the amount as claimed by the respondent society is due and payable by the revision petitioner as per the accounts maintained by the society. Therefore, considering that the Arbitrator has rightly rejected the claim of the revision petitioner, the Principal District Judge, Erode has also rightly dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. That judgement does not call for any interference by this Court. 7. In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with cost. However, it is open to the revision petitioner to move the first respondent society i.e. Adi Dravida Auto Rickshaw, Drivers Industrial Co-operative Society with regard to the amount payable and the society can consider the request of the revision petitioner, in that the revision petitioner has purchased the Auto by availing loan from the society meant for only Adi Dravida Community and if possible to waive penal interest.