ORDER 1. THE PETITIONER WIFE HAS FILED THIS PETITION SEEKING TRANSFER OF THE MATRIMONIAL CASE BEING NO. M-35 OF 2003 TITLED PRAKASH MATHUR V. SUMITA PENDING IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI TO THE DISTRICT JUDGE, PORT BLAIR, ANDAMAN DISTRICT, ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS, WHERE SHE IS RESIDING. NOTICE THEREON WAS ISSUED AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE ABOVEMENTIONED MATRIMONIAL CASE BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT WERE STAYED BY THIS COURT. IN PURSUANCE THEREOF THE RESPONDENT HUSBAND HAS PUT IN APPEARANCE IN PERSON. 2. IT IS STATED THAT THE PETITIONER AS WELL AS THE RESPONDENT HAVE MUTUALLY AGREED TO DISSOLVE THEIR MARRIAGE. THEY HAVE FILED AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 13-B OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 (FOR SHORT "THE ACT") FOR DISSOLUTION OF THEIR MARRIAGE AS THE SAME HAS BROKEN IRRETRIEVABLY. SINCE THE ORIGINAL FILE IS NOT BEFORE US, IN THE FITNESS OF THINGS, IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO DIRECT THE OFFICE TO RETURN THE ORIGINAL PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13-B OF THE ACT, FILED BY THE PARTIES ALONG WITH THE ANNEXURES THEREWITH, TO THE PETITIONER FOR BEING PRESENTED IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI. WE DIRECT ACCORDINGLY. 3. KEEPING IN VIEW THE FACT THAT THE PETITIONER HAS COME FROM PORT BLAIR, ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS, TO ATTEND THE HEARING OF THE CASE, WE WOULD REQUEST THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI A TO TAKE UP THE PETITION FOR HEARING IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSE OF IT AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE. 4. WITH THIS DIRECTION, THE TRANSFER PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS IN VIEW OF THE SETTLEMENT ARRIVED AT BETWEEN THE PARTIES. 5. INTERIM STAY GRANTED BY THIS COURT ON 30-1-2004 STANDS VACATED.