Jheky] lnL;&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ vf/kfu;e kCn lEcksf/kr fd;k tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr lgk;d dysDVj] fdkux< ds fu.kZ; fnukad 27-10-2004 ds fo:) jktLo e.My esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- vizkFkhZ la- 1@oknh us ,d jktLo okn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 53] 58 ds vUrxZr lgk;d dysDVj] fdkux<+ ds ;gkWa izkFkhZ@izfroknhx.k o vizkFkhZ la- 2 ls 13@izfroknhx.k ds fo:) izLrqr fd;kA okn ds nkSjku Mh-MCyw- 2 lqUnj csok lqokyky dk c;ku fnukad 19-7-2001 dks gqvkA mDr c;ku ls izkFkhZx.k dks ;g tkudkjh gqbZ fd o"kZ 1950 ds vklikl lEor~ 2010 ds iwoZ lkaork dk nsgkUr gks x;kA lkaork] x.ksk vkfn dh kkeykrh dCts dkr o [kkrsnkjh dh fdkux<+ esa Hkwfe fLFkr gSA ftl ij vHkh lkaork ds fgLls ij jkedj.k ¼oknh½ dkfct dkr gS] ftlds lsVyesaV esa [kljk ua- 1456 o 1581@6051 vkSj ,dhdj.k [kljk ua- 799] orZeku [kljk ua- 1247 gS jdck 05 ch?kk gSA izfroknhx.k us iz;kl dj lkaor ds uke ls lacaf/kr [kljk dh lEor~ 2010 ls 2041 rd dh tekcanh o feyku {ks=Qy dh udysa jktLo foHkkx ls fnukad 1-10-2004 dks izkIr dj fnukad 7-10-2004 dks] vknsk 13 fu;e 2 lhihlh lifBr vknsk 8 fu;e 1 , ¼2 o 3½ lhihlh ds vUrxZr yfEcr okn esa izLrqr dh] ftls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vius vknsk fnukad 27-10-2004 }kjk fujLr dj fn;kA mDr vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZ@izfroknhx.k us ;g fuxjkuh jktLo e.My esa isk dh gSA 3- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZ la- 1 dsfo;Vj dh vksj ls mifLFkr gksus okys vf/koDrk dks fuxjkuh dh xzkg+;rk ds Lrj ij lqukA 4- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k dk rdZ gS fd lkaork ds uke ls lacaf/kr nLrkost egRoiw.kZ gS rFkk U;k;fgr esa fu.kZ; gsrq mu nLrkostksa dks vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkuk vko;d gSA lEor~ 2010 ls 2041 rd dh tekcanh o feyku {ks=Qy dh udyksa dk mUgsa iwoZ esa Kku ugha FkkA nLrkost okn ls lacaf/kr i{kdkjksa ls lacaf/kr gSA budk Kku mUgsa Mh-MCY;w- 2 lqUnj ds c;kuksa ls gqvkA okn esa izkFkhZx.k us tokcnkok] uohu lakks/ku lhihlh fnukad 1-7-2002 ds vkus ls iwoZ gh isk dj fn;k FkkA bl dkj.k mudk izkFkZuk i= iks"k.kh; FkkA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us viuh vf/kdkfjrk ls ijs vknsk ikfjr fd;k gS] bl dkj.k mDr vknsk fujLr ;ksX; gSA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 2004¼2½ Mh,uts ¼jkt-½ 675 U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izkFkhZx.k dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr djrs gq, fdlh dkj.k dk mYys[k ugha fd;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vknsk vk[;kid vknsk ugha gSA 5- vizkFkhZx.k la 1 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr nLrkost dh orZeku izdj.k ds fu.kZ; esa dksbZ izklaxrk ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k Lo;a us v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa izkFkZuk i= isk fd;k] ftlds vLohdkj gksus ij izuxr fuxjkuh ds ek/;e ls mls jktLo e.My esa pqukSrh nh xbZ gS] bl dkj.k {ks=kf/kdkj dk izu gh ugha mBrkA izkFkhZx.k }kjk nLrkost iwoZ esa le; ij D;ksa ugha izLrqr fd;s tk ldsa] bl laca/k esa tks dkj.k crk;s x;s gS os mfpr ugha gSA Mh-MCY;w 2 lqUnj csok lqokyky dk c;ku 19-7-2001 dks gh gks x;k Fkk] tcfd izkFkZuk i= nLrkostksa dks vfHkys[k ij ysus ds fy, fnukad 7-10-204 dks izzLrqr fd;k x;kA izkFkZuk i= ij vknsk l{ke vf/kdkjh }kjk ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA vizkFkhZ la- 1 ,d ofj"B ukxfjd gSA U;k; dh eakk Hkh ;g gS fd ofj"B ukxfjdksa ds izdj.kksa dk kh?kz fuLrkj.k gksA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkjchts 2004 i`"B 306¼1½] U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; ugha gS] D;ksafd og dsl fMlkbZMsM esa ugha vkrhA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkjvkjMh 1983 i`"B 652 ¼2½] U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA izkFkhZx.k izuxr nLrkostksa ds ek/;e ls jkedj.k dks lkaork ds ;gka xksn tkuk fl) djuk pkgrs gS] tcfd xksn dks fl) dus esa izkFkhZx.k dks izuxr nLrkostksa ls dksbZ lgk;rk ugha feysxhA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkjvkjMh 1984 i`"B 338 ¼3½] U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA 6- izR;qrj esa izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vknsk fnukad 27-10-2004 ds fo:) fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; gS ,oa vius bl dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus Chouth Mal vs. Fazal Hussain (4), U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA U;k;fgr esa nLrkost fdlh Hkh Lrj ij vFkkZr~ fu.kZ; djus ls iwoZ rd vfHkys[k ij fy;s tk ldrs gS vkSj U;kf;d n`"VkUr vkjvkjMh 2003 i`"B 161 ¼5½ dk lgkjk fy;kA 7- eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k ds rdksZ ij euu fd;k rFkk muds }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa o izuxr vknsk dk v/;;u fd;kA 8- v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izkFkhZx.k dk izkFkZuk i= eq[; :i ls bl vk/kkj ij fujLr fd;k fd vknsk 13 f;e 2 lhihlh ds izko/kku fMyhV gks pqds gSa rFkk pwafd izkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkZuk i= mDr izko/kku ds fMyhV gksus ds ckn isk fd;k x;k gS] vr% izkFkZuk i= pyus ;ksX; ugha gSA ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us lUrohjflag cuke ,Mhkuy flfoy tt] guqekux<+ ,.M vuknj ¼6½] ds fu.kZ; ds iSjk 26 esa dgk gS%& ``We are of the view that as far as first two grounds are concerned, the trial Court was misled by the amendment made in the Order 8 Rule 1-A(3) CPC. The written statement was filed on 24.8.2001 much before the amending provisions came into force and the amended provisions of Order 8, Rule 1-A(3) were not applicable at the time.The issues were framed on 23.11.2001 before the amending provisions came into force. Therefore, that Trial Court has per se committed illegality while holding that the defendant had not relied upon these documents in his written statement and he has also not mentioned these documents inthe list of reliance. The amending provisions which came into force after framing of the issues and at the time when the evidence of the parties were going, on, these amendments were introduced from 1.7.2002, therefore, while relying upon these amended provisions, the Trial Court was wrong in dismissing the saidl application of the defendant since the amending provisions were nto applicable at that stage. It is also true that Order 13, Rule 2 was also not applicable when the said application was filed. Therefore, the defendant has moved this application under Order 8 Rule 1(3) CPC, since at the time of the filing of the written statement and framing of the issues, the amending provisions were not in force, but when this application was moved on 8.9.2003, the amending Act has come into force. Thus, the defendant has rightly moved the application under Order 8 Rule 1-A(3). The consideration on which the application was rejected by the Trial Court was totally on wrong premises. Thus the Trial Court has wrongly interpreted teh law dis-allowed the application. Thus, the defendant has rightly moved the application under Order 8 Rule 1-A(3). The consideration on which the application was rejected by the Trial Court was totally on wrong premises. Thus the Trial Court has wrongly interpreted teh law dis-allowed the application. 9- vizkFkhZ la- 2 ls 13 izksQksekZ vizkFkhZ gSA izuxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa ds ifjizs{; esa esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vknsk ikfjr djrs le; viuh vf/kdkfjrk dk lgh mi;ksx ugha fd;k tks mlesa fufgr gSA 10- ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh xzkg+;rk ds Lrj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA izkFkhZx.k ij 700@& :- ¼lkr lkS :i;s½ dkWLV ds yxkdj muds }kjk izLrqr nLrkost vfHkys[k ij fy;s tkrs gS ,oa vknsk fnukad 27-10-2004 vikLr fd;k tkrk gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks funsZk fn;s tkrs gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk fnukad 7-10-2004 dks izLrqr vkosnu i= esa of.kZr nLrkostksa dks vfHkys[k ij ysa ckrZs izkFkhZx.k] vizkFkhZ la- 1 dks 700@& :- dkWLV ds fnukad 29-11-2004 ds iwoZ vnk djsaA vizkFkhZ la- 1 dks fjcVy esa nLrkost isk djus vf/kdkj gksxkA vizkFkhZ la- 1 dkWLV izkIr djus dh fnukad ls 10 fnu ds Hkhrj fjcVy esa nLrkost isk dj ldsxkA 11- vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA