ORDER N. K. Mehrotra, J.—This is a petition for issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 14.9.1999, rejecting the renewal of the lease of the tank in question in favour of the petitioner. 2. According to the petitioner, he was granted a fishing lease on plot No. 391 area 10 bigha for a period of ten years situate in village Shahanwa, Pargana Haveli Avadh, Tehsil and district Faizabad. There is a provision of renewal of the fishing lease but the opposite parties have not renewed the fishing lease in spite of the fact that the petitioner has invested a huge amount. 3. Nobody appeared from the side of the petitioner because of the fact that the petitioner has obtained an interim order on 29.9.1999 and he is continuing the fishing operation on the basis of the lease, which has not been renewed by the opposite parties. 4. I have heard Shri R. K Srivastava, the learned standing counsel. 5. In Pheru v. State of U. P., 2004 (22) LCD 86, a Full Bench of this Court has declared para 60 (2) (ka) of U. P. Gram Sabha Manual, which makes a provision for renewal of a lease of fishing rights, to be invalid and it has been laid down that the leases shall be re-settled after holding public auction or inviting tenders. Since para 60 (2) (ka) of U. P. Gram Sabha Manual has been declared ultra vires of the Constitution, the law declared by the Full Bench is binding on every authority. Therefore, in view of the decision of the Full Bench, the petitioner has no right to claim renewal of the lease of fishing rights. 6. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed.