Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2004 DIGILAW 179 (RAJ)

Tulsi Ram v. Mathurala

2004-02-06

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL, RAVISHANKER SRIVASTAVA

body2004
Jheky] lnL;-&;g f}rh; vihy jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr vf/kfu;e kCn ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tk;sxk½ dh /kkjk 224 ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] fpRrkSMx<+ ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 29-5-1999 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd oknh eFkqjkyky us mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] fuEckgsM+k ds U;k;ky; esa vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88 o 53 ds vUrxZr izfroknh rqylhjke o vU; ds fo:) ,d okn izLrqr fd;k ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 27-11-1997 }kjk Lohdkj fd;kA fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 27-11-97 ls O;fFkr gksdj izfroknhx.k@ vihykFkhZx.k us vihy jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] fpRrkSM+x< ds U;k;ky; esa isk dh] vihy ds lkFk izfroknhx.k@vihykFkhZXk.k us ifjlhek vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= Hkh isk fd;kA izFke vihy U;k;ky; us vius fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 29-5-1999 }kjk vihykFkhZx.k dh izFke vihy fujLr dj nhA mDr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZx.k us f}rh; vihy jktLo e.My esa isk dh] tks vfUre cgl ds fy;s gekjs le{k isk gqbZA 3- izR;FkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh ih-,l- nkksjk us izkjfEHkd vkifRr mBkrs gq, ;g dgk fd izFke vihy U;k;ky; ds vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy fe;kn ds fcUnq ij fujLr dh ftlds fo:)] fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; gS u fd f}rh; vihyA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkjvkjMh 1987 ist 470 ¼1½] ,vkbZvkj 1987 ,eih ist 120¼2½] ,vkbZvkj 1997 jkt- ist 284¼3½] U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk lgkjk fy;kA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fu.kZ; fnukad 27-11-1997] /kkjk 2¼2½ lhihlh ds vUrxZr fMØh dh tks ifjHkk"kk nh xbZ gS] mldh ifjf/k esa Hkh ugha vkrkA vihy U;k;ky; us dkuwu ds fo:) fMØh cuk Hkh nh gS rks vihykFkhZ mldk Qk;nk ugha mBk ldrsA 4- vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dh nyhy gS fd fu.kZ; fnukad 27-11-1997 xq.kkxq.k ij ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] dsoy fe;kn ds fcUnq ij gh fu.kZ; ugha fd;k x;kA blh dkj.k izFke vihy U;k;ky; us fMØh Hkh cukbZ gS] ftlds fo:) f}rh; vihy iks"k.kh; gSA fodYi esa mUgksaus ;g Hkh dgk fd vxj fu.kZ; fnukad 27-11-1997 ds fo:) U;k;ky; ;fn bl urhts ij igqWaps fd f}rh; vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gS rks bls fuxjkuh esa laifjofrZr fd;k tkosaaaaA 5- geus mHk; i{k ds fOk}ku vf/koDrkvksa dh cgl ij euu fd;k o izuxr fu.kZ; fnukad 27-11-1997 dk v/;;u fd;kA 6- v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izFke vihy dks le; ckf/kr ekuk vkSj vius fu.kZ; ds iSjk ua- 6 esa fy[k fd ^^bl U;k;ky; esa iqujkosnu fnukad 11-6-1998 dks isk fd;k x;k] ftlds fy;s fnu izfr fnu dh nslh dk Li"Vhdj.k izkFkZuk i= esa ugha fn;k x;k gS] QyLo:i iqujkosnu ifjlhek ls ckf/kr gksuk ik;k tkrk gSA** blds ipkr~ v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vius blh fu.kZ; ds iSjk ua- 7 esa vihy fuLrkfjr djrs gq, ;g vafdr fd;k gS fd ^^vc dsoy bl vk/kkj ij fd foHkktu lwph rglhynkj ds LFkku ij iVokjh }kjk cukbZ xbZ] dsoy ek= bl rduhdh =qfV ds vk/kkj ij lEiw.kZ foHkktu dks vuqfpr ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS] foks"k rkSj ls tcfd mDr foHkktu okn&iqf"V rglhynkj us vius i= Øekad 57 fnukad 17-11-1997 ls mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dks izsf"kr fd;k x;k gS] ftlls ge v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vfUre fMØh esa dksbZ =qfV ugha ikrsA ifj.kkeLo:i izLrqr iqujkosnu lkjghu gksus ls Lohdkj ;ksX; gSA** blls Li"V gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vius dk fu.kZ; fnukad 27-11-1997 xq.kkxq.k ds vk/kkj ij ikfjr fd;k gSA 7- izR;FkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr ckyd`".k ,oa vnlZ cuke rqylk ckbZ ,.M vuknj ¼4½] ,oa psykjke cuke ek.kd ¼5½] ,oa /kk:jke cuke i`Fohjkt ¼6½] dk voyksdu djus ls Li"V gS fd mijksDr lHkh ekeyks esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; us dsoy ifjlhek vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 5 dk fuLrkj.k fd;k Fkk] vihy dk xq.kkxq.k dk fuLrkj.k ugha fd;k Fkk ,oa mu vknskksa ds fo:) vihy dh xbZ ftlesa ;g ekuk x;k fd vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gSA izuxr izdj.k esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us ifjlhek vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i= ij dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, vihy dk Hkh xq.kkxq.k dk fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; nks izdkj dk gks ldrk gS ;k rks fMØh ds :i esa;k vknsk ds :i esa] ij og ,d lkFk ugha gks ldrk] tSlk fd ,vkbZvkj 1915 izhoh dkSafly 116¼7½] esa fu/kkZfjr fd;k gSA izuxr fu.kkZ;d ds ek/;e ls fooknxzLr fo"k;ksa esa lHkh i{kdkjksa ds vf/kdkjksa dh vo/kkj.kk dh xbZ gS mlds ipkr~ mldk xq.kkxq.k ij fopkj dj izFke vihy dks lkjghu ekurs gq, fujLr dj fn;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us fu.kZ; fnukad 27-11-1997 dh fMØh Hkh cukbZ gSA ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us eSllZ cksM~l ,.M cksMZl izkbZosV fyfeVsM] t;iqj cuke eSllZ fgeky; isij ¼ekhujh½ izkbZosV fyfeVsM] ubZ fnYyh ¼8½] esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ``(A) Civil P.C. (1908), Sections 2(2), 2(9), 2(14)-Decree judgment and order-Distinction between-Words ``formal epxression suit is barred by limitation and is liable to be-dismissed- Amounts to final adjudication-Appeal lies and not revision. blh izdkj ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us jkuh pkS/kjh cuke lwjtthr pkS/kjh ¼9½] esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ``In the present case, the appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation. That it was an appeal even though barred by time is clear from Mela Ram & Sons. vs. Commr. Of Income-tax, 1956 SCR 166 : AIR 1956 SC 367 . Where Venkatarama Ayyar J., speaking for the Court, after referring to Nagendranath Dey vs. Suresh Chandra Dey, (1932) 59 Ind. App. 283 at. p. 287 : AIR 1932 PC 165 at p. 167; Raja Kulkarni vs. State of Bombay, 1954 SCR 384 at p. 388 : AIR 1954 SC 73 at p. 74 and Promotho Nath Roy vs. W.A. Lee, AIR 1921 Cal. 415 held that `` an appeal presented out of time is an appeal and an order dismissing it as time-barred is one passed in appeal. There can be no dispute then that in law what the respondent did was to file an appeal and that the order dismissing it as time-barred was one disposing of the appeal. 8- mijksDr fu.kZ; ls Li"V gS fd nsjh dks {kE; djus ds izkFkZuk i= ds lEcU/k esa tks vknsk ikfjr fd;k x;k gS og vihy esa ikfjr vknsk ekuk tk;sxkA mijksDr foospu ds ifjizs{; esa gekjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa izuxr ekeys esa f}rh; vihy iks"k.kh; gs bl dkj.k izR;FkhZ] dh izkjfEHkd vkifRr fujLr dh tkrh gSA vihy vfUre cgl ds fy;s fnukad 18-3-2004 dks fdlh Hkh [k.MihB ds le{k isk gksA 9- vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA