JUDGMENT Both the Letters Patent Appeals are taken up for final disposal with the consent of parties. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and counsel for the respondent. Ku. Archana Shrivastava had filed a Writ Petition No. 6405/02 in the nature of mandamus seeking compliance of order dated 23.7.2001 passed by Commissioner, Rewa. The operative part of the order of the Commissioner, Rewa reads as under: ^^vr% bl U;k;ky; ds fnukad 22-1-1999 ds vkns’kkuqlkj dqekjh vpZuk JhokLro dks fu;qfDr dh çFke ik=rk gks tkrh gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vihykFkhZ Jherh vpZuk JhokLro dks Jherh ‘kSy flag ls Åij dk LFkku feyuk pkfg,A vxj vihykFkhZ dqekjh vpZuk JhokLro dks dk;Z djus dk volj ugha feyk rks ;g mudh =qfV ugha ekuh tkuh pkfg, vkSj dqekjh vpZuk JhokLro dks ^^dke ugha osru ugha ds fl)kar dks ykxw djrs gq, vuqHko ds vad Hkh fn, tkus pkfg, vkSj ojh;rk Øe fu/kkZj.k esa dqekjh vpZuk JhokLro dks Jherh ‘kSy flag ls Bhd Åij LFkku çnku fd;k tkuk pkfg,A pw¡fd in fjDr crk;k x;k gS vr% ml fjDr in ds fo#) mijksDrkuqlkj dq- vpZuk JhokLro dh inLFkkiuk djrs gq, ojh;rk dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k tk;s fu;eksa eas ifjorZu esa ifjorZu ds dkj.k fdlh vH;FkhZ dk oS/kkfud gd ugha lekIr fd;k tk ldrkA bl vkns’k dh çfr eq[; dk;Zikyu vf/kdkjh] lh/kh dks Hksth tk,A mijksDrkuqlkj ;g vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA çdj.k iath esa ntZ gksdj lekIr gksA** The learned Single Judge vide order dated 16.10.2003 allowed the writ petition with the direction to the respondents to comply with the orders passed by the Commissioner within one month. Aggrieved by this, the appellants have preferred these appeals. The learned Single Judge vide impugned order has merely directed to comply with the order passed by the Commissioner way back on 23.7.2001. Smt. Shail Kumari Singh appellant of LP A 806/2003 apprehends her termination in consequence of the order passed in the writ petition. We see that the apprehension of the appellant is misconceived. There is no direction in the orders passed by learned Single Judge to remove the appellant, on the other hand the order of the Commissioner was directed to be complied with by learned Single Judge. In the order of Commissioner the fact finds place that 'as stated post is vacant'. In this view of the matter the appeal of Jila Panchayat is also of no merit. In the order of Commissioner the fact finds place that 'as stated post is vacant'. In this view of the matter the appeal of Jila Panchayat is also of no merit. Thus, we find no merit in both the appeals and accordingly the same are dismissed. The Jila Panchayat Sidhi is directed to implement the order dated 23.7.2001 passed by the Commissioner as directed by the learned Single Judge within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. However, this will not preclude Jila Panchayat Sidhi seeking creation of new posts if such a representation is made to the State Government, same shall be considered in accordance with law. LPA is disposed of accordingly. No costs.