Jheky] lnL;&;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ fo:) fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] dksVk fnukad 5-8-99 ¼vihy la[;k 102@99½ izLrqr dh x;h gSA 2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd vihykFkhZ@oknh us ,d okn vUrxZr /kkjk 88] 89] 91 ,oa 188 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 U;k;ky; lgk;d dysDVj >kykokM ds ;gka bl vkk; dk isk fd;k fd oknxzLr vkjkth ij oknh dk yxkrkj dCtk dkr kkafriwoZd fcuk fdlh :dkoV ds pyk vk jgk gS ,oa vkt Hkh dkfct gksdj yxku tek djkrk vk jgk gSA izR;FkhZx.k@izfroknh us fnukad 28-6-73 dks iqjkuk [kljk uEcj 44 esa ls 10 ch?kk 17 fcLok Hkwfe 3300@& esa oknh dks cSpku dj nhA cSpku ds vk/kkj ij oknh dks dCtk eq[kkyQkuk ds vk/kkj ij [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj Lor% izkIr gks pqds gSA oknh us mDr Hkwfe dks mlds uke djus ds fy, dgk fdUrq izfroknhx.k tcju oknh dks csn[ky dj mDr Hkwfe ij dCtk djuk pkgrs gSA vr% oknh dks oknxzLr vkjkth dk [kkrsnkj dkrdkj ?kksf"kr fd;k tkosA lgk;d dysDVj >kykokM+ us vko;d rufd;kr dk;e djrs gq, ckn lquokbZ vius fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 17-4-99 }kjk okn Lohdkj dj fy;kA ftlls O;fFkr gksdj izfroknhx.k us mDr fu.kZ; ds f[kykQ izFke vihy U;k;ky; Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dksVk ds ;gka isk dh ftUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 5-8-99 }kjk vihy Lohdkj dj lgk;d dysDVj dk fu.kZ; o fMØh fujLr dj nhA ftlls O;fFkr gksdj ;g f}rh; vihy e.My esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl lquhA 4- vihy rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd vihykFkhZ us cgl esa dgk fd vihykFkhZ i{k }kjk ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88 ,oa 188 ds rgr nkok fd;k x;k FkkA ewy :i ls lacaf/kr vkjkth 34 ch?kk 19 fcLok Fkh ckn esa Hkw izcU/k foHkkx }kjk ;g 22 ch?kk 10 fcLok dj nh xbZ] blesa ls 10 ch?kk 17 fcLok ij vihykFkhZ dk dCtk gSA ;g vkjkth iathd`r foØ; i= ds tfj;s dkyw ds firk ls fnukad 28-6-73 dks [kjhn dh xbZ FkhA /kkjk 63¼1½¼iv½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr vihykFkhZ dks [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj feys pqds gSA vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 42 ¼ch½ [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj iznku djus ls otZu ugha djrhA vr% vihy Lohdkj dh tkosA vihykFkhZ us vius dFku ds leFkZu esa vkjvkjMh 2002 i`"B 47 = RLW 2002(2) Raj. 1142 U;kf;d n`"Vkar dk lgkjk fy;kA 5- izR;qRrj esa izR;FkhZx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us dgk fd lUnfHkZr [kjhn vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds O;fDr }kjk vuqlwfpr tkfr dh [kkrsnkjh dh d`f"k Hkwfe fnukad 28-6-73 dks [kjhn dh xbZ gS] & tks jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e ds izHkko esa vkus ds ckn ls gh xSj dkuwuh gSA bl ij Hkh /kkjk 42 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e esa fnukad 1-5-65 dks ;g lakks/ku Hkh gqvk gSA ftlesa ;g Li"V fd;k x;k gS fd vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds [kkrsnkj dkrdkj ,d nwljs dks Hkh d`f"k Hkwfe dk cSpku ugha dj ldrs] & igys ,slk fd;k tkuk kwU;dj.kh; FkkA ijUrq fnukad 1-5-1964 ds ckn bls kwU; djkj fn;k x;k gSA izuxr izdj.k esa vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr ckcwflag cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku vkjvkjMh 2002 i`"B 47 ¼lqijk½] rF;ksa ls fHkUu gksus ds dkj.k ykxw ugha gksrh D;ksafd ckcwflag ds izdj.k esa okn foØ;drkZ }kjk izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA tcfd izuxr izdj.k esa okn [kjhnnkj }kjk izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA le>kSrk fMØh Hkh mijksDr Øe esa xSj dkuwuh ekuh xbZ gSA vius bl dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkjvkjMh 1999 i`"B 7 U;kf;d n`"Vkar dk lgkjk fy;kA xSj dkuwuh dk;Zokfg;ksa esa izfrdwy dCts o fe;kn dk fcUnq egRoghu gksrk gSA bl rjg ds izdj.kksa esa [kjhnnkj dks dksbZ gd gkfly ugha gksrs] pkgs og le>kSrk gh D;ksa u dj ysA vius bl dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkjchts 2003 i`"B 122 U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;kA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us vihy ds vUrxZr fu.kZ; ds ekeys esa vUroZfyZr lHkh egRoiw.kZ izuksa dk fofup; fd;k gSA bl dkj.k vknsk 41 fu;e 31 lhihlh ds izko/kkuksa dh vuqikyuk dh xbZ gSA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 1994 MCY;w ,y ,u ¼2½ i`"B 322 U;kf;d n`"VkUr ij voyacu fd;k gSA bl rjg ds izdj.kksa esa fu;ekuqlkj 175 o 183&[k vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr gh dk;Zokgh laHko gSA bu izko/kkuksa ds vrxZr Hkh fe;kn vkfn dk fcUnq Hkh fuf.kZr fd;k tkuk vko;d gSA /kkjk 42 esa vf/kfu;e vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds O;fDr ds fgrkFkZ foks"k izko/kku gS] & ftlds en~ns utj vU; izko/kkuksa dks vk/kkj cukdj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k tkuk xSj dkuwuh ,oa eu ekuk gSA v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; U;k; dh eakkuqlkj gSA vr% izuxr f}rh; vihy fujLr dh tkosA 6- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa dh i=kofy;ksa ,oa i{kdkjksa }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us ;g ekuk gS fd izR;FkhZ la- 1 ds firk dkyw us fookfnr vkjkth vihykFkhZ dks tfj;s iathd`r foØ; i= fnukad 28-6-1973 }kjk foØ; dhA dkyw tkfr ls pekj gS o vihykFkhZ Nhrjyky tkfr ls ehuk vFkkZr vuqlwfpr tu tkfr ds gSA bl izdkj foØ; fof/k }kjk fuf"k) gS ,oa izkjEHk ls gh kwU; gSA jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us vkjvkjMh 1979 ist 207 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tu tkfr }kjk vU; tkfr ds i{k esa fd;k x;k foØ; izkjEHk ls gh kwU; gS vkSj og fof/k }kjk izoRkZuh; (enforceable) ugha gSA ``Raj. Tenancy Act, Sec. 42–Nature of Proviso–Contract Act, Sec. 23–Whether sale by member of S.C. or S.T. against provisions of Sec. 42, void or voidable–Proviso, couched in negative from–Negative device to make statute imperatives as held in AIR 1961 S.C. 1107 –Proviso, held of a mandatory character–Proviso, intended to safeguard interest of members of S.C. or S.T.–Sale by member of S.C. to non-member, held forbidden by law within meaning of Sec. 23–Sale, held void and not enforceable in law. blh fl)kUr dks vkjvkjMh 1986 ist 51 o vkjvkjMh 1990 ist 212 esa izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gSA vkjvkjMh 2003 ist 389 = RLW 2003 RJ 258 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us ;g dgk fd%& ``(A) Raj. Tenancy Act, Section 42–Proviso to Section 42 added by Amendment Act of 1956 prohibiting transfer to non-SC/ST person–Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 members of S.C. made sale on 31.12.1956 to petitioners who are not members of S.C.–Proviso had come into force w.e.f. 22.9.1956–Held, sale was in violation of amended provisions of Section 42. blls Li"V gS fd vihykFkhZ dks bl foØ; i= ls dksbZ [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj ugha feyrsA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vihykFkhZ ds i{k esa [kkrsnkjh dh ?kks"k.kk dh gS] og dkuwu fo:) gS] tSlk fd jktLo e.My esa vkjvkjMh 1989 ist 774 o vkjvkjMh 1992 ist 114 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA 8- geus ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ^ckcwflag cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku ,.M vnlZ* vkjvkjMh 2002 ist 47 ¼lqijk½ dk voyksdu fd;k] ftldk iSjk la- 7 bl izdkj gS fd%& ``As per the facts emerging the original tenant Akuda has transferred his tenancy rights in 1963 to one Nihal Singh, who in turn has sold his rights to present petitioner in 1975 and put him in possession. Akuda was not possession since transfer made by him in 1963. The case at least comes to that transfer made by Akunda (sic Akura ?) being void in view of proviso (b) to Sec. 42 no right title or interest of Akuda passed to Nihal Singh and consequently to Babu Singh the present petitioner. Akuda was not possession since transfer made by him in 1963. The case at least comes to that transfer made by Akunda (sic Akura ?) being void in view of proviso (b) to Sec. 42 no right title or interest of Akuda passed to Nihal Singh and consequently to Babu Singh the present petitioner. This may result in that agreement not being capable of enforced Akunda (sic Akura ?) remained owner of tenancy rights and with that also retained rights to recover possession of land in his own right and with that also retained rights to recover possession of land in his own right from the person put in possession under a void deed of transfer, thus by dint of void transfer by a member of scheduled caste or scheduled tribe the right became subject to Sec. 63 (1)(iv) of the Tenancy Act, if he fails to sue for recovering possession within 12 years from the date the transferee under void transfer was put in possession, and his suit for recovering that possession has became barred by time, his tenancy rights otherwise extinguishes in terms of Sec. 63(1) (iv) of the Raj. Tenancy Act. Undeniably, on the Revenue Authorities own conclusion, Akuda has not used for recovery of possession of land in question during his life time, nor any such application as has been made by his widow giving rise to present proceedings was made before. Thus said Akuda or his legal representatives has lost right to recover possession from their transferees, whose position of filing suit for recovering possession from him, still continue to be governed by limitation prescribed for recovering possession. Thus widow of Akuda could not have maintained an application for recovering possession from the petitioner, when the tenancy right of her husband had already become extinet under Sec. 63(1)(iv) of the Act. vihykFkhZ us ftl lanHkZ esa mijksDr U;kf;d n`"Vkar dk lgkjk fy;k gS] og rF; orZeku izdj.k esa fo|eku ugha gSA orZeku izdj.k esa vihykFkhZ [kjhnnkj gSA 9- mijksDr foospu ds vuqlj.k esa ;g f}rh; vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gS o fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] dksVk fnukad 5-8-99 ¼vihy la- 102@99½ cgky j[kk tkrk gSA fjdkMZ ekrgr vnkyr ykSVk;k tkosA 10- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA