JUDGMENT Mehtab S. Gill, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner was granted bail by this Court vide order dated 29.8.2001. During the course of trial, the petitioner got ill and could not present here self before the trial Court on a date when the evidence had to be recorded. Petitioner was ill and photostat copies of all the certificates issued by the Doctor, Civil Hospital, Zira were placed before the trial Court. 2. Learned counsel for the State has stated that the recovery from the petitioner and her co-accused is a commercial quantity and concession of bail should not be granted. 3. I have perused the impugned order dated 12.11.2003. This Court vide order dated 29.8.2001 had granted bail to the petitioner. The petitioner got ill and bail bonds of the petitioner were cancelled and forfeited to the State. Photostat copies of the certificates issued from Civil Hospital, Zira were placed on the file of the trial Court along with the bail application. The learned trial Court in the impugned order has observed that a number of doctors are indulging in malpractices and issuing fake medical certificates. 4. I do not agree with the sweeping observations made by the trial Court. The Court should have first summoned the Doctor and verified the correctness and truthfulness of the certificates issued by the Doctor. The certificates are from Civil Hospital, Zira and not from a private practitioner. 5. Order dated 12.11.2003 is set aside. Bail is granted to the petitioner to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With the above observations, petition is disposed of. Petition allowed.