Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2004 DIGILAW 297 (SC)

Commissioner Of Central Excise, PONDICHERRY v. ACER INDIA LTD.

2004-02-27

H.K.SEMA, S.N.VARIAVA

body2004
ORDER 1.Heard parties. 2.Appeals admitted. 3. In the case of PSI Data Systems Ltd. v. CCEI it has been held thatcomputer and its software are distinct and separate items. It is held thatcomputer may not be capable of effective functioning unless loaded with software, but still these are not parts ofcomputer and even if they are sold along with the computer their value does not form part of the assessable value. 4. With the greatest of respect to the learned Judges concerned, we find ourselves unable to agree with the view that even thoughcomputer may not function withoutsoftware, still that would not be part ofcomputer. Section 4 of the Central Excise Act reads as follows: "4. Valuation of excisable goods for purposes of charging of duty of excise.-(1) Where under this Act, the duty of excise is chargeable on any C excisable goods with reference to their value, then, on each removal of the goods, such value shall- (a) incase where the goods are sold by the assessee, for delivery at the time and place of the removal, the assessee and the buyer of the goods are not related and the price is the sale consideration for the sale, be the transaction value; (b) in any other case, including the case where the goods are not sold, be the value determined in such manner as may be prescribed. (2) The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect of any excisable goods for whichtariff value has been fixed under sub-section (2) of Section 3. (2) The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect of any excisable goods for whichtariff value has been fixed under sub-section (2) of Section 3. (3) For the purpose of this section,- (a)-(c) * * * (d) transaction value means the price actually paid or payable for the goods, when sold, and includes in addition to the amount charged as price, any amount that the buyer is liable to pay to, or on behalf of, the assessee, by reason of, or in connection with the sale, whether payable at the time of the sale or at any other time, including, but not limited to, any amount charged for, or to make provision for, advertising or publicity, marketing and selling organisation expenses, storage, outward handling, servicing, warranty, commission or any other matter; but does not include the amount of duty of excise, sales tax and other taxes, if any, actually paid or actually payable on such goods." (emphasis supplied) Thus, any amount whichbuyer has to pay "by reason of or in connection 9 with the sale" is part of the transaction value. There are softwares without whichcomputer cannot work at all. There may be softwares which contain additional or ancillary applications whichcustomer may want to buy separately. An additional or ancillary application would, of course, be classifiable separately and cannot be included in the value ofcomputer. Butbuyer has to buy software without which the computer cannot work. The computer would otherwise bedead box, if software, without which the computer cannot work, is not purchased. When one talks ofcomputer, asunderstood in the trade, it is not just the box or the hardware.computer contains of both hardware and the operating software. The price of such softwares is thus the amount whichbuyer is bound to pay by reason of or in connection with the sale of computers. It appears to us that the price of such software is thus includable in the value for purposes of excise duty. We, therefore, feel that the matter requires reference tolarger Bench. The papers b may be placed before the Honble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders. Court Masters