JUDGMENT 1. - By way of instant petition u/s. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioners have challenged the order dated 13.12.2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Tack) Court, Anoopgarh refusing to interfere with the order dated 18.11.2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Gharsana taking cognizance against them for offence u/ss. 419, 420, 467, 474, 447 & 120-B IPC. 2. At the outset it may be pointed out that complainant-Birju has died and there is no body to pursue the complaint. Be that as it may, Birju filed a complaint alleging that 24.10 Bighas of land in Chak No. 21 M.C. In Murraba No. 22/24 was in his possession. However, a forged document was prepared and the land has been transferred in the name of petitioners. The police investigated the matter and forwarded a final report. The complainant-Birju filed a protest petition. He also got some witnesses examined. On the basis of that the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioners for offence u/ss. 419, 420, 467, 474, 447 & 120-B IPC. On perusal of the record it appears that with respect to the same land between the same parties civil and revenue suits are pending. The controversy in the civil and the revenue Court is with respect to genuineness of the agreement in question. In view of this it is not desirable that civil and criminal proceedings should run parallel. 3. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The order of the Courts below taking cognizance against the petitioners for the offences referred to above is quashed and set aside.Petition allowed. *******