Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2004 DIGILAW 445 (RAJ)
Purshottam v. Shikhar Chand through L. Rs.
2004-03-23
A.K.PUROHIT
body2004
iqjksfgr] lnL; & ;g fuxjkuh /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ ds varxZr lgk;d dysDVj ¼la{ksi esa ^,l-Mh-vks-*½ ukxkSj ds vknsk fnukad 23-4-2001 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds laf{kIr rF; bl izdkj gS fd orZeku izkFkhZx.k@oknhx.k us ,d okn varxZr /kkjk 88 ,oa 92 , vf/kfu;e dk ,l-Mh-vks-] ukxkSj ds le{k izLrqr fd;k] ftlesa vizkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k dh vksj ls tokcnkok izLrqr djus ds ckn mldh vksj ls fdlh ds mifLFkr ugha gksus ds vk/kkj ij ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh dk okn fnukad 30-5-1996 dks izfroknhx.k ds fo:) fMdzh dj fn;k x;kA bl vknsk ds fo:) izfroknhx.k la- 3 ls 6 fk[kjpUn] fueZy dqekj] lqjskpUnz o ujsUnz dqekj us ,l-Mh-vks-] ukxkSj ds le{k vkosnu i= varxZr vknsk 9 fu;e 13 lifBr /kkjk 151 lhihlh dk izLrqr fd;k] ftl ij lquokbZ ds ipkr~ fo}ku ,l-Mh-vks- ukXkkSj us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 23-04-2001 }kjk orZeku vizkFkhZx.k ¼izfroknh la- 3 ls 6½ dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj fnukad 30-5-1996 dks ikfjr ,di{kh; fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh dks vikLr dj ewy okn iqu% uEcj ij fy;s tkus dk vknsk fn;k gSA ,l-Mh-vks-] ukxkSj ds vknsk fnukad 23-4-2001 ds fo:) ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k fnukad 15-3-1996 dsk vizkFkhZx.k ;k muds vfHkHkk"kd ds vuqifLFkr jgus ds vk/kkj ij muds fo:) ,drjQk dk;Zokgh dk vknsk gqvk vkSj fQj fnukad 30-5-1996 dks lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij ,drjQk fMdzh ikfjr dh xbZ gSA vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls U;k;ky; esa vuqifLFkr jgus dk dksbZ okftc dkj.k ugha crk;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds i{k esa gqbZ ,drjQk fMdzh dks fujLr djus esa vius {ks=kf/kdkj ls ckgj tkdj vknsk ikfjr fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd orZeku vizkFkhZx.k }kjk ,drjQk fMdzh dks fujLr djus dk izkFkZuk i= le;kof/k esa izLrqr ugha fd;k x;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us U;k; dh n`f"V dks vk/kkj crkrs gq, muds i{k esa gqbZ ,drjQk fMdzh dks fujLr fd;k gS] ysfdu U;k; ds fy, ;g D;ksa t:jh Fkk] ugha crk;k x;kA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ,drjQk fMdzh dks fujLr djus dk izkFkZuk i= dsoy izfroknhx.k la- 3 ls 6 us izLrqr fd;k ysfdu fopkj.k U;k;ky; us lHkh izfrokfn;ksa ds fo:) ikfjr ,drjQk fMdzh fujLr djus dh dkuwuh Hkwy dh gSA ,drjQk fMdzh dks fujLr djkus ds izkFkZuk i= ds leFkZu esa fdlh vfHkHkk"kd dk gYQukek Hkh izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k] tks fd t:jh FkkA 4- tokc esa vizkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd muds fo:) ,drjQk fMdzh dh tkudkjh gksus ij muds }kjk ,drjQk fMdzh dks fujLr djus dk izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vknsk 9 fu;e 13 lhihlh izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftls fopkj.k U;k;ky; us foLr`r foospu ds ckn vius {ks=kf/kdkj dk mi;ksx djrs gq, fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS] ftlesa bl fuxjkuh ds Lrj ij gLr{ksi ugha fd;k tkuk pkfg,A mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius ,drjQk fu.kZ; fnukad 30-5-1996 esa oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr lk{;ksa ds foospu cxSj gh nkok fMdzh fd;k gS rFkk fnukad 15-3-1996 dks muds vf/koDrk ds vuqifLFkr jgus ls muds fo:) ,drjQk dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ xbZ tkdj mlh fnu rudh dk;e dj fnukad 15-3-1996 dks ,drjQk fMdzh ikfjr dj nh xbZ] ftls okn ds xq.kkxq.k ij fu.kZ; ugha dgk tk ldrk gSA blh vk/kkj ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; us Lo;a bl ,drjQk fMdzh dks fujLr dj okn dk xq.kkxq.k ij fuLrkj.k djus dk vknsk ikfjr fd;k gSA vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vknsk fnukad 23-4-2001 dk leFkZu fd;kA 5- geusa nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k ds rdZ lqus] mu ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 6- izLrqr izdj.k esa orZeku izkFkhZx.k }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa okn fnukad 7-7-1984 dks izLrqr fd;s tkus ij ntZ jftLVj fd;k x;k rFkk izfroknhx.k dks ryc fd;k x;kA vknsk fnukad 15-3-1996 dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk izfroknhx.k ds vf/koDrk ds iSjoh gsrq gkftj ugha gksus ij muds fo:) ,drjQk dk;Zokgh dh xbZ ,oa mlh vknsk esa ,d rudh dk;e dh xbZA fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vknsk fnukad 15-3-1996 bl [TRUNCATED]
In the present case, the approach of learned trial court cannot be said to be justice oriented and as such if the order impugned is allowed to stand, it would defeat the cause of justice, It is to be imbibed by all the courts of law that whenever or wherever the substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the courts of law should not allow the substantial justice either to escape or to slide on mere technicalties. 21- izLrqr izdj.k esa ,drjQk fu.kZ; o fMdzh fnukad 30-5-1996 ds voyksdu ls ;g Hkh Li"V gksrk gS fd mDr ,drjQk fu.kZ; o fMdzh esa oknh }kjk izLrqr fd;s x;s nLrkostksa o lk{;ksa dk gokyk rks fn;k x;k gS ysfdu fdlh Hkh nLrkosth lk{; vFkok ekSf[kd lk{; dk rfud Hkh foys"k.k vFko foospu ugha fd;k x;k gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us vius fu.kZ; B. Janakiramaiah Chetyy vs. A.K. Parthasarthi and Ors. (10)] esa ;g O;oLFkk nh gS fd cxSj lk{;ksa dh foospuk o foys"k.k fd;s ,drjQk fMdzh dks lhihlh ds vknsk 9 fu;e 13 ds rgr~g fujLr fd;k tkuk pkfg,A 22- izLrqr izdj.k ds rF;ks] fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ,oa U;k;ky;ksa dh uthjksa ds e/; utj fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ,drjQk fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh dks fujLr fd;s tkus dh tks vknsk ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] og vknsk u rks {ks=kf/kdkj ds ckgj tkdj fn;k x;k fu.kZ; gS vkSj u gh bl vknsk esa dksbZ ,slh vfu;ferrk vFkok voS/kkfudrk gS ftlesa fdlh izdkj ds gLr{ksi dh vko;drk gksA 23- ifj.kkeLo:i ;g fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkrh gS rFkk ,l-Mh-vks-] ukxkSj dk vknsk fnukad 23-4-2001 ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gSA 24- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2004 DIGILAW 445 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]