ORDER S.S. Saron, J. - This is a petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the notification dated 11.6.1971 (Annexure-P.1) issued under Section 36 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 (the Act for short), the notification dated 31.10.1973 (Annexure-P.2) issued under Section 41 of the Act and the award dated 2.6.1976 (Annexure-P.3). 2. The Improvement Trust, Pathankot (respondent No. 2) issued notice under Section 36 of the Act in accordance with resolution No. 7 passed at a special meeting of the Pathankot Improvement Trust, Pathankot held on 31.4.1971 with respect to an expansion scheme known as Timber Market and Truck Stand etc. which had been framed under Sections 24/28(2)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi), (viii), (ix), (x) and (xi) of the Act for an area measuring approximately 92.30 hectares (228 acres). 3. Today, at the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in respect of this very notification, this Court had disposed of a similar writ petition, i.e., C.W.P. No. 2352 of 1991, titled Amolak Singh and others v. The Pathankot Improvement Trust, Pathankot and others, decided on 31.10.2002 with the following directions :- (i) The Improvement Trust, Pathankot, in consultation with the State Government, shall re-consider the entire matter in regard to implementation of its amended scheme : (ii) The respondents shall take into consideration the inequities which have been created as a result of inaction and delay on the part of the State or its agencies; (iii) It is not for this Court to pronounce upon the matters relating to State policies and implementation thereof. It is for the competent authorities to decide what State ought or ought not to do. Thus, I leave the matter entirely in the wisdom of the State Administration, however, with an observation that discrimination in equality and inequities should be avoided in the State action, particularly to the lass (?) of the petitioners afore-noticed; (iv) The concerned respondents shall take appropriate action against all the erring officers and officials, irrespective of their position and status, who are found to be erring in any respect including the fact that the inaction on the part of the State, Trust and other Departments and agencies of the State, who have, by their conduct or otherwise, permitted the unauthorised colonies to come up, for all this period. The action should be taken against all such persons after holding enquiry in accordance with law. All such enquiries must be concluded within a period of six months from the date of pronouncement of this order. Report of compliance by the Secretary of the State, Administrator/Chairman of the Trust would be submitted to the Registrar of this Court." 4. It is prayed that the present petition be also disposed of in terms of the said directions. 5. For the reasons stated in Amolak Singhs case (supra), the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms. Petition disposed of.