Judgment 1. The petitioner was admitted in I.T.I, Muzaffarpur in session 1999-2000. He appeared at the final examination held in the month of July, 2000. However, his result was not published and as such the petitioner has moved this Court for issue of direction for publication of result. 2. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 wherein stand has been taken that admission of the petitioner in the I.T.I. Muzaffarpur was not as per rules and as such his registration has been cancelled vide letter dated 11th May, 2002 i.e. much after the holding of the examination in the month of July, 2000. 3. From the materials available on the record this much is obvious that the petitioner was admitted and he was allowed to appear in the examination held in the month of July, 2000. The respondents could not detect any infirmity in admission before allowing the petitioner to appear in the examination. In fact the infirmity in admission has been detected much after holding the examination of the petitioner i.e. in the month of July, 2000 and accordingly cancelled the registration. The action of the respondents, in the circumstance, cannot be held to be reasonable and justified. If at all there was any need it could have been done prior to holding of the examination in the case of Shri Krishan V/s. The Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, AIR 1976 Supreme Court 376 it has been held that once the appellant was allowed to take the examination rightly or wrongly the respondents cannot withdraw the candidature of the applicant and appellant cannot be refused admission subsequently for infirmity which could have been looked into before giving the applicant permission to appear. A Bench of this Court also in similar situation has directed to publish the result vide Annexure-5. Thus, on consideration I find that the action of the respondents is not at all justified and the petitioner cannot be denied the relief prayed for. 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the authority concerned to publish the result of the petitioner without making unnecessary delay preferably within three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.