Judgment 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. By this application, the petitioner prays for issuance of a direction upon the respondents to regularise him on Class IV post. 3. According to the case of the petitioner, he is working on daily wages under the respondents since 1976, but till date he has not been regularised. 4. The facts, as alleged in this application, are not in dispute save and except in annenure 7 that the petitioner is continuing on daily wages since 1979. 5. The fact that the petitioner is working on daily wages for about 25 years itself is a justification to regularise him. 6. Nowhere it is stated in the counter affidavit as to whether sanctioned Class IV posts are lying vacant. However, it is stated that the petitioner, as a matter of right, cannot ask for his regularisation on Class IV post. 7. It is true that ipso facto the petitioner cannot claim for regularisation, but, in my opinion, it would be unfair to allow the petitioner to work continuously for 25 years on Class IV post. 8. A person, who is working on daily wages for a pretty long time, has legitimate expectation that he will be regularised in due course. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for his regularisation keeping in view the fact that he is working under them on daily wages since last 25 years and to take a decision within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 10. With the direction/observation aforesaid, this application is disposed of.