JUDGMENT : 1. This appeal has been filed by the State of Rajasthan questioning the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court holding that the accusations made against the respondent-accused were not established. The respondent faced trial for the alleged commission of offence punishable u/s. 302 IPC. The allegation was that he caused death of his wife by sprinkling kerosene on her and thereafter setting her aflame. The trial Court found the accused guilty, convicted and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-. The High Court by the impugned judgment held that the prosecution has failed to prove its accusations. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. There is no appearance on behalf of the respondent. Learned counsel for the appellant strenuously urged that the approach of the High Court in discarding the dying declarations recorded by PW-10 & PW-21 is erroneous. In both these dying declarations, the deceased had categorically stated about the role played by the accused. 3. We have perused the judgment of the Courts below and the evidence on record. We find that there are in fact three sets of dying declarations. First was before PWs 2, 5 & 6 who were carrying the deceased in an injured condition to the hospital. The deceased had categorically stated that she got burnt while lighting the stove. In the statement recorded by PW-10 there was no mention about any demand of dowry which was later on introduced in the alleged dying declaration recorded by PW-21. The High Court has considered this aspect and has noticed that there was possibility of tutoring of the deceased by the relatives and the two subsequent dying declarations appear to be the result of tutoring. Accordingly the High Court found the prosecution version to be not acceptable and cogent. 4. The view taken by the High Court is a reasonable and possible view on the evidence and appears to have been arrived at after analysing the evidence on record in detail. That being so we are not inclined to interfere with the judgment of acquittal recorded by the High Court. The appeal fails and is dismissed. The bail bonds of the respondent be cancelled. Appeal dismissed.