Judgment S.K. Keshote, J.-Heard learned counsel for the parties on the admission of the application and perused the contents thereof . 2. Admit. Issue notice to the respondent. 3. Mr. B.C. Meena, the Official Liquidator, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent, thus notice needs not to issue. Service is complete. 4. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that this matter is squarely covered by the order dated 25-7-2003 of this Court in S.B. Company Application No. 23 of 2003 in S.B. Company Petition No. 30 of 1996 - S.P. Gaur vs. Rajasthan State Agro Industries Corpn. Ltd., thus the matter is taken up for final hearing. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties I am satisfied that this matter is squarely covered by the order dated 25-7-2003 of this Court in the Company Application aforesaid. It is not in dispute that, the order of winding-up of the Rajasthan State Agro Industries Corporation Limited was kept in abeyance by the stay order of the Court. Thus, the winding-up order was passed but it is stayed. The Official Liquidator has not been appointed as its Liquidator. 6. In view of these facts, prima facie, I am satisfied that no such leave is required but as in the writ petition the court has asked the applicants to seek the leave of the Company Court, accordingly same is accorded. 7. The application is allowed. The applicants are permitted to prosecute their writ petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2900/2000, before the Bench concerned.