Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2004 DIGILAW 852 (RAJ)

Kumari Rajni D/o Tara Singh v. State of Rajasthan

2004-05-27

K.S.RATHORE

body2004
JUDGMENT 1. - The respondent No.2 issued an advertisement and invited applications from the candidates for training in Educational Institutions in various districts for BSTC course. The total seats for this course was 50 in District Institute of Educational Training at Sikar. The petitioner applied for admission in the training course of BSTC before the respondent No.3 against the reservation quota of Other Backward Classes. 2. On 20.12.2003, the respondent No. 3 issued a merit list category wise, but the petitioner's name did not find placed in the merit list. 3. The petitioner in para 7 of the writ petition categorically stated that the last cut-off merit of general female candidates was 73.87 while the petitioner was having 74.62% marks. The grievance of the petitioner is that less meritorious candidates have been given admission and the petitioner has been deprived of the admission. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the circular issued by the respondents, in case, the reserve category candidate comes under the merit list of general category then he shall be considered under the general category. 5. Be that as it may, in view of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner is advised to represent before the respondent raising the contentions which are raised here in this writ petition. The respondents are expected to consider the representation of the petitioner pursuant to the circulars issued by the respondent and in case the petitioner is found eligible and meritorious, she may be given admission in BSTC Course at Sikar. It is expected from the respondents to undertake the said exercise within a period of 15 days from the date of filing of representation by the petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.Writ Petition Disposed Of. *******