kekZ] lnL;&;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ ^vf/kfu;e* dgk tkosxk½ fo:) fu.kZ; o fMØh jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj fnukad 30-12-1996 ds izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd oknh@vihykFkhZ us ,d jktLo okn izfroknhx.k@izR;FkhZx.k ds fo:) bl vkk; dk izLrqr fd;k fd vkjkth [kljk ua- 349 jdck 1 ch?kk 1 fcLok okds dLck Hkjriqj pd ua- 2 oknh dh lEifRr gS] ijUrq jktLo vfHkys[k esa izfroknhx.k ds viuk uke crkSj xSj [kkrsnkj ntZ djok fy;k] tcfd mijksDr Hkwfe ij oknh dk gh dCtk pyk vk jgk gSA okn ds yfEcr jgrs gq, izfroknh la- 6 txUukFk izlkn dh e`R;q gks xbZ vkSj oknh us le; ij txUukFk ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks vfHkys[k ij ysus ds fy, dk;Zokgh ugha dhA oknh@vihykFkhZ }kjk txUukFk ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks fjdkMZ ij ysus gsrq izkFkZuk i= isk djus ij fnukad 17-3-1987 dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vihykFkhZ dk izkFkZuk i= bl krZ ij Lohdkj fd;k fd oknh@vihykFkhZ [kpsZ ds 49@& :i;s vxyh iskh rd vnk djsaA ;fn dkWLV dh vnk;xh vkxkeh rkjh[k iskh ls iwoZ ugha dh tk;sxh rks vknsk fu"izHkkoh gksxkA oknh@vihykFkhZ }kjk fufpr vof/k esa dkWLV vnk ugha djus ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vknsk fnukad 1-9-1987 dks ;g vknsk iznku fd;k fd e`rd txUukFk izlkn ds fo:) nkok vcsV le>k tkosaA 3- izfroknh@izR;FkhZx.k us ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa ,d vkosnu i= izLrqr dj dgk fd dsoy txUukFk ds fo:) gh nkok vcsV ugha gksrk] oju~ iwjk nkok vcsV gksrk gSA ijh{k.k U;k;ky; us izfroknhx.k@izR;FkhZ ds izkFkZuk i= ij iqu% fopkj dj fnukad 13-10-1987 dks ;g vknsk ikfjr fd;k fd e`rd txUUkkFk dk ,oa vU; izfroknhx.k dk fgr vyx ls ugha dgk tk ldrk bl dkj.k lEiw.kZ nkok gh vcsV gqvk le>k tkosA fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 13-10-1987 ds fo:) oknh@vihykFkhZ us vihy la- 84@94 jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj ds le{k isk dh] ftls mUgksaus muds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 30-12-1996 }kjk [kkfjt dj nhA fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 30-12-1996 ls O;fFkr gksdj oknh@vihykFkhZ us ;g f}rh; vihy jktLo e.My esa isk dhA 4- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dks lquk x;kA 5- vihykFkhZ@oknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd vknsk fnukad 1-9-1997 ds }kjk nkok txUukFk izlkn ds fo:) vcsV ekuk x;k] ftlds fo:) oknh@vihykFkhZ us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj ds le{k vihy izLrqr dh] tks vihy la- 111@94 ntZ jftLVj gqbZ vkSj jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 30-12-1996 }kjk vihy vLohdkj dh] ftlds fo:) oknh@vihykFkhZ us fuxjkuh Vh,@61@97 jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dh] tks fnukad 9-3-2004 dks Lohdkj dh xbZ rFkk 2000@& :i;s dh dkWLV ij txUukFk ds okfjlku dks vfHkys[k ij ysus ds fy, vknsk fn;s] D;ksafd vknsk fnukad 13-10-1987 o 30-12-1996 dk eq[; vk/kkj ijh{k.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 1-9-1987 Fkk vkSj ;g vknsk jktLo e.My }kjk fuxjkuh la- Vh,@61@97 }kjk fujLr fd;k tk pqdk gS] bl dkj.k izuxr vihy dks Lohdkj fd;k tk;sA 6- izR;FkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd nkos dks QSlyk gh gks x;k vkSj nkos ds yfEcr jgrs ftrus vUrfje vknsk ikfjr fd;s x;s Fks] os nkos ds QSlys ds lkFk gh mlesa vUrfuZfgr gks x;sA vr% izFke vihy U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fujLr ;ksX; ugha gSA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus ,vkbZvkj 1962 ,llh 89 ,vkbZvkj 1972 ,llh 1181 U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk lgkjk fy;kA 7- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh i=kofy;ksa dk voyksdu fd;kA 8- dysDVj yS.M ,Dohtsku] vuUrukx ,.M ,unj cuke felst dVh th ,.M vnlZ ¼,vkbZvkj 1987 ,llh 1353½ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us laizs{k.k fd;k gS fd%& ``When substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred for the other side cannot claim to have vested right in injustice being done because of an non-deliberate delay. vihy o fuxjkuh izLrqr djus ij okn dh fujUrjrk (continuation) tkjh jgrh gSA LRs of Kalyan vs. LRs of Noor Mohd. (RRD 1988 page 207) esa jktLo e.My dh ,dyihB us ;g laizs{k.k fd;k gS fd%& ``Hence, when there is a substtution in a pending appeal or revision and the matter is remanded to the court below, the latter has to see that the names of those who are dead, should be removed from the record and those who are substituted in the appellate court should be brought on the record and no separate application is necessary. ,u- t;jke jsM~Mh cuke jsosU;w fMfotuy vkQhlj ¼,vkbZvkj 1979 ,lhlh 1393½ esa mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& ``A substitution of legal representatives of the deceased party in an appeal or revision even against an interlocutory order would enure for the subsequent stages of the suit on the footing that appeal is a continuation of a suit and introduction of a party at one stage of a suit would enure for all subsequent stages of the suit. izuxr izdj.k esa jktLo e.My dh ,dyihB us fuxjkuh Vh,@61@97 esa vknsk fnukad 9-3-2004 }kjk txUukFk izlkn ds okfjlku dks 2000@& :i;s dh dkWLV ij vfHkys[k ij fy;s tkus ds vknsk iznku fd;sA izR;FkhZx.k us fcuk fdlh izfrca/k ds ml izdj.k esa 2000@& :i;s dh dkWLV izkIr dj yh gS] tks izdj.k fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gSA vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr LVsV vkWQ iatkc cuke ukFkwjke ¼,vkbZvkj ,lh 89½ ,oa jkekX;k izlkn xqIrk cuke eqjyh izlkn ,.M vnlZ ¼,vkbZvkj 1997 ,llh 1181½ U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk voyksdu fd;k] ftlesa e`rd ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks vfHkys[k ij u ykus ds dkj.k mu izdj.kksa ds rF;ksa ds vuqlkj iwjs okn dk vcsV gksuk ekuk x;k ijUrq izuxr izdj.k esa rF; fHkUu gS] bl dkj.k izuxr izdj.k ij pLik ugha gksrsA 9- okn esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 1-9-1997 jktLo e.My }kjk ikfjr fuxjkuh Vh,@61@97 esa fnukad 9-3-2004 dks fujLr dj fn;k x;k] bl dkj.k ijh{k.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 13-10-1987 o jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 30-12-1996 gekjh lqfopkfjr jk; easa fuxjkuh@Vh,@11@97 esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 9-3-2004 esa foy; gks x;kA foy; ds laca/k esa pkanh izlkn cuke txnhk izlkn ¼2004¼8½ ,llhlh 724½ = (RLW 2004(4) SCC 629) esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g dgk gS fd%& ``23- The doctrine of merger is based on the principles of propriety in the hierarchy of justice delivery system. The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation passed by the Appellate Authority. The said doctrine postulates that there cannot be more than one operative decree governing the same subject matter at a given point of time. Kunhayammed and Ors. vs. State of Kerala & Anr. ( 2000(6) SCC 359 ) esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g dgk gS fd%& ``12.... Once the Superior Court has disposed of the lis before it either way-Whether the decree of order under appeal is set aside or modified or simply confirmed, it is the decree or order of the Superior Court Tribunal or authority which is the final binding and operative decree or order wherein merges the decree or order passed by the Court, Tribunal or the authority below. However, the doctrine is not of universal or unlimited application. However, the doctrine is not of universal or unlimited application. The nature of jurisdiction exercised by the superior Forum and the content or subject matter of challenge laid or which could have been laid shall have to be kept in view. Radhamoni Padhiari vs. Tangudu Jaganatham and Another (AIR 1978 mMhlk 209½ esa ekuuh; mM+hlk mPp U;k;ky; us fuxjkuh esa ikfjr vknsk dk okn ij D;k izHkko gksxk] ds lEcU/kksa esa ;g izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd%& (B) Civil P.C. (5 of 1908) S. 115 and Order 9 Rule 7 - Ex-parte decree in suit pending revision against dismissal of application under Order 9, Rule 7, Revision does not become infructuous - Further proceedings in suit will stand vacated. 10- mijksDr foospu ds ifjizs{; esa rFkk U;k; ds fgr ds lanHkZ esa bl izdj.k dh fosk"k ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ;g vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Hkjriqj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 30-12-1996 ¼vihy la- 84@94½ rFkk lgk;d dysDVj] Hkjriqj dk fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 13-10-1987 ¼izdj.k la- 73@85½ vfHk[kf.Mr fd;s tkrs gSaA 11- mHk; i{k dks funsZfkr fd;k tkrk gS fd os izdj.k la- 73@85 ds fuLrkj.k esa lg;ksx iznku djus gsrq U;k;ky; lgk;d dysDVj] Hkjriqj ds le{k fnukad 15-2-2005 dks mifLFkr gksA 12- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA