Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2005 DIGILAW 1063 (SC)

Mridul Dhar (Minor) v. Union of India

2005-05-13

P.P.NAOLEKAR, S.B.SINHA, Y.K.SABHARWAL

body2005
ORDER : Y.K. Sabharwal, J. The aspect regarding increasing of all-India quota from 15% to 20%, inclusion of seats under Section 10-A of the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1993 while calculating 15% all-India quota and constitution of High-Powered Committee and/or appointment of ombudsman would be considered after the counselling in respect of Academic Year 2005-2006 is complete. Regarding counselling by videoconferencing, we are of the view that, at the first instance, on an experiment basis, videoconferencing can commence between Delhi and Rajasthan as indicated in para 14 of Annexure ?A? to the affidavit of Prof. Sanjay Shrivastava filed in January 2005. If successful, counselling by videoconferencing can be introduced to other States as well from the next Academic Year 2006-2007. However, we permit the Director General of Health Services to revert back to normal one-to-one counselling in case any difficulty is felt while conducting counselling by videoconferencing. 2. The States of Manipur, Tripura, Chhattisgarh and the Union Territory of Chandigarh may file their affidavits within two days. Two weeks' time is allowed to the States of Madhya Pradesh and Orissa to file the requisite affidavits. 3. List the matter in the month of August 2005.