Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2005 DIGILAW 1109 (SC)

BOMBAY MERCANTILE COOP. BANK LTD. v. SIRAJBHAI G. LEHRIS

2005-07-15

P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN, R.C.LAHOTI

body2005
ORDER 1. THERE IS A DECREE FOR. EVICTION PASSED AGAINST THE APPELLANT ON 30.11.2002. THE DECREE ALSO DIRECTS INQUIRY UNDER ORDER 20 RULE 12 CPCTO BE HELD FOR THE QUANTUM OF MESNE PROFITS. THE PREMISES ARE SITUATED IN A BUILDING KNOWN AS "NAVRATAN" ON P.D. MELLO ROAD IN THE CITY OF MUMBAI. THE TOTAL AREA IN POSSESSION OF THE APPELLANT IS 13,646 SQ FT OUT OF WHICH 5523 SQ FT IS ON THE GROUND FLOOR. IT IS NOT DISPUTED THAT THE PROPERTY IS IN A BUSY COMMERCIAL LOCALITY. IT WAS HELD BY THE APPELLANT ON TENANCY AND THE RATE OF RENT WAS TO BE CALCULATED @ RS 3.50 PER SQ FT. OUR ATTENTION IS INVITED TO THE LETTER DATED 16-8-2004 SENT BY THE APPELLANT TO THE RESPONDENT WHEREIN THE APPELLANT HAD EXPRESSED ITS AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF RENT AT THE RATE OF RS 4.50 LAKHS PER MONTH PROSPECTIVELY AL1D WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THIS LETTER IS NOT DENIED IN THE REPLY FILED BY THE APPELLANT TO THE RESPONDENTS APPLICATION. 2. AFTER HEARING THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES, THE ORDER STAYING EXECUTION OF DECREE FOR EVICTION UNDER APPEAL IS CONFIRMED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. WITH EFFECT FROM 1-12-2002 THE APPELLANT SHALL PAY AN AMOUNT CALCULATED @ RS 14 PER SQ FT PER MONTH. 2. WITH EFFECT FROM 1-9-2004 THE APPELLANT SHALL PAY AN AMOUNT CALCULATED @ RS 4.50 LAKHS PER MONTH.. 3. THE ARREARS CALCULATED AS PER DIRECTIONS (1) AND (2) ABOVE FOR THE PERIOD EXPIRING WITH 31-12-2005 SHALL BE PAID IN TWO INSTALMENTS. HALF OF THE AMOUNT SHALL BE PAID ON OR BEFORE 15-10-2005 AND THE BALANCE AMOUNT SHALL BE PAID ON OR BEFORE 31-12-2005. 4. THE CURRENT MONTHLY PAYMENT W.E.F. 1-8-2005 SHALL BE MADE ON OR BEFORE THE 15TH DAY OF EACH MONTH. 5.THE INQUIRY UNDER ORDER 20 RULE 12 CPC MAY PROCEED. IT HAS NOT BEEN STAYED. 6. THE AMOUNT PAID IN TERMS OF THIS ORDER SHALL BE LIABLE TO BE ADJUSTED AGAINST THE LIABILITY INCURRED BY THE APPELLANT UNDER THE FINAL DECREE PASSED UNDER ORDER 20 RULE 12 CPC. 7. THE AMOUNT APPOINTED BY THIS ORDER IS ONLY A TENTATIVE FIGURE AND DOES NOT IN ANY MANNER EXPRESS ANY OPINION ON THE AMOUNT OF RENT WHICH THE SUIT PREMISES WOULD BE LIABLE TO FETCH AND THE INQUIRY UNDER ORDER 20 RULE 12 CPC SHALL PROCEED AND BE CONCLUDED UNINFLUENCED BY THIS ORDER. 3. 7. THE AMOUNT APPOINTED BY THIS ORDER IS ONLY A TENTATIVE FIGURE AND DOES NOT IN ANY MANNER EXPRESS ANY OPINION ON THE AMOUNT OF RENT WHICH THE SUIT PREMISES WOULD BE LIABLE TO FETCH AND THE INQUIRY UNDER ORDER 20 RULE 12 CPC SHALL PROCEED AND BE CONCLUDED UNINFLUENCED BY THIS ORDER. 3. THIS IS ONLY AN INTERIM ORDER AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE FINAL RESULT IN THE APPEAL. 4. IA STANDS DISPOSED OF. COURT MASTERS