Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2005 DIGILAW 1160 (PNJ)

Sushil Kumar Thapar @ Raju Thapar v. Smt. Anju Nahar

2005-11-09

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

body2005
Judgment Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. 1. This petition has been filed against charge. Learned counsel for the complainant says that matter has been settled and the complainant is not interested in pursuing the matter further. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Compromise deed has been filed, which is taken on record as Mark `A. 3. Learned counsel of the State has not been able to raise any objection against prayer for quashing. 4. Accordingly, charge against the petitioner is set aside. The petition is disposed of.