JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material/record of the case made available to me during the arguments of the case. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name of the petitioner was not mentioned in FIR, however, on the basis of statement of Chhitarmal and Ramkishan the name of the petitioner has been added as an accused. He further submits that statement of Chhitarmal and Ramkishan were recorded on 17.3.2005 and 21.3.2005 i.e. after a period of more than one month. He further submits that Ramkishan so called witness and the injured Kallulal both are real brothers and both are sons of Jeewan Ram. There was no reason for Ramkishan to disclose the name of petitioner immediately after the date of incident. He further submits that due to political rivalry the accused has been implicated in the, case falsely. The case diary was summoned. 3. Although the learned P.P. has opposed the bail application but could not satisfy as to why the statement of Ramkishan, who was brother of the injured Kallulal, was not recorded immediately and no explanation has been given for the delay in recording the statement of Ramkishan. 4. Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I am inclined to allow this bail application of the petitioner/s under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 5. Therefore, the SHO/I.O. of Police Station Chhabra, District Baran is directed in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Balram S/o. Shri Dhanna Lal in FIR No.48/2005, registered under Sections 447, 308 & 323 Indian Penal Code he shall enlarge him/her/them on bail provided he/each of them furnish/furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions: (i) He/She/They shall make himself/themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when requires; (ii) He/She/They shall not, directly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the case Court or to any police Officer; (iii) He/She/They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Petition allowed. *******