ORDER 1. IT IS UNFORTUNATE THAT DESPITE AN EARLIER ORDER OF THIS COURT QUASHING THE ORDER OF DETENTION, PRIMARILY ON ACCOUNT OF LAPSES ON THE PART OF THE STATE IN NOT PRODUCING BEFORE THIS COURT THE RELEVANT EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS, THE SAME MISTAKE .HAS AGAIN BEEN COMMITTED BY THE STATE WHICH HAS FILED A COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT WHICH WE FIND TO BE WHOLLY UNSATISFACTORY AND FOR THE SAME REASONS. COUNSEL FOR THE STATE SUBMITS THAT HE SHOULD BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO FILE A BETTER AFFIDAVIT. HE HAS, NO DOUBT, PRODUCED BEFORE US THE ORIGINAL FILE BUT WE DO NOT WISH TO COMMENT AT THIS STAGE ON ANY MATTER CONTAINED IN THE FILE WHICH IS NOT BROUGHT OUT IN THE PLEADINGS OF THE PARTIES BEFORE US. WE, THEREFORE, GRANT TO THE STATE OF J&K SEVEN DAYS TIME TO FILE A PROPER RETURN AFTER SERVING A COPY OF THE SAME ON THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER. THE PETITIONER IS GRANTED SEVEN DAYS TIME THEREAFTER TO FILE REJOINDER-AFFIDAVIT, IF SO ADVISED. PUT UP THIS MATTER ON 15-92005. 2. IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE STATE HAS NOT SHOWN ANY DILIGENCE IN THE MATTER DESPITE THE EARLIER ORDER OF THIS COURT, WE IMPOSE COST OF RS 25,000 TO BE PAID BY THE STATE OF J&K TO THE PETITIONER. COURT MASTER