JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there was no intention to cause death. He states that accused has given one push when deceased was sitting over the roof of bus and he fell down and due to head injury he died. He states that accused had no knowledge. Charge-sheet under Section 304 I.P.C. has been filed against the accused-petitioner. He states that accused petitioner will not misuse the bail, therefore, he may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed this bail application and states ti it accused had knowledge that while pushing him from bus, he may die. Therefore, bail may not be granted. 4. I have considered the rival arguments advanced by both the parties. Looking to all the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that accused has not given any injury over the person of deceased and has only pushed him when deceased was sitting over the bus, without commenting on the merits of the case since it has not been said that accused petitioner will misuse the bail and tamper with the witnesses. I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner knit S/0 Prabhu Dayal be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. *******