Judgment Krishan Kumar Acharya, J.-Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the complainant has lodged the report against the petitioner which is false and fabricated. No case under Section 304-B, IPC has been found by the Investigating Officer. He further states that accused-petitioner has been arrested and interrogated by the police. It is further stated that accused-petitioner is in custody and the trial of the case is likely to take long time. Therefore, he prays that accused-petitioner may be released on bail. Accused-petitioner will not misuse the bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned Counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed this bail application and stated that she was brought from her maternal house just before her death. There is evidence of demand of dowry. Since, investigation is still going on, therefore, bail may not be granted to the petitioner. 4. I have considered the rival arguments advanced by both the parties and also gone through the case-diary. After investigation, the Investigating Officer has not found offence under Section 304-B, IPC against the petitioner. Looking to all the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merit of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439, CrPC is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mala Ram S/o Goma Ram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/-with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/-each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.