Judgment H.R. Panwar, J.-By the instant revision petition, under Section 397/401, CrPC, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.02.2004 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Chittorgarh (for short the revisional Court hereinafter) whereby the order passed by Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh (for short the trial Court hereinafter) in Criminal Misc. Case No. 181/2001 was modified to the extent that maintenance awarded by the trial Court is payable from the date of application and not from the date of order of the trial Court. 2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the revisional Court fell in error in modifying the effective date from which the maintenance is payable. Section 125(2), CrPC, provides that any such allowance shall be payable from the date of order, or, if so ordered, from the date of application for maintenance. 3. In view of the decision of this Court in Qamruddin vs. Srimati Rashida, 1992 (1) WLC 305 (Raj.), the order of revisional Court cannot be sustained as the revisional Court has not assigned any reason for modifying the date from which the maintenance is payable. 4. Consequently, the impugned order of revisional Court dated 11.02.2004 is set aside and that of the order of trial Court dated 07.04.2003 is restored. Revision petition is accordingly disposed of . Stay petition also stands disposed of .