JUDGMENT 1. - Heard and perused the orders impugned dated 22.3.2005 and 30.7.2005. 2. It appears that powers under section 24 of CPC has been curtailed by the proviso appended to sub-section (1) of Section 43 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 by which the District Judge can transfer election petition to only civil judge or Additional Civil, Judge (Senior Division) subordinate to him. And election petition cannot be transferred to the Additional District Judge who is subordinate to the District Judge for the purposes of transfer of cases under section 24 of CPC. It is, therefore, apparent that intention of the Legislature in enacting above noted provisions in the Act of 1994 and Rules of 1994 is a persona designata and his action Is dealing with the election petition cannot be revised. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the judgment rendered by this court in the case Smt. Indira v. Smt. Prabha reported in 1998 (1) WLC (Raj.) 81 . I have gone through the aforesaid judgment and of the opinion that the ratio decided in the aforesaid case squarely cover the present controversy. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands allowed and the orders Annexures 1 and 4 dated 22.3.2005 and 30.7.2005 are hereby quashed and set aside and it is expected from the District Judge either to hear himself or to transfer the election petition as per proviso appended to Section 43 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Raj. Act, 1994.Writ petition allowed. *******