Judgment H.R. Panwar, J.-Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State, perused the order impugned and challan papers. I have carefully gone through the statements of injured eye-witness PW.1, Maina, wife of deceased PW.3 Kanta, daughter of deceased, PW.4 Geeta, sister of the deceased and PW.5 a child witness namely Kishna Ram, son of the deceased. 2. PWs. 1, 3 and 4, the wife, daughter and sister of the deceased respectively have not supported the prosecution case and turned hostile. PW. 5 also to some extent does not support the prosecution case. 3. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 4. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439, CrPC is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Hadmana Ram s/o Agra Ram and Jetha Ram s/o Bholu Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 16/2005. P.S. Thawla provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 20,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.