Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2005 DIGILAW 2354 (RAJ)

Surendra Singh v. Bhawanisingh

2005-09-02

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL, N.K.JAIN

body2005
Jheky] lnL;&;g f}rh; vihy jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ ^^vf/kfu;e 1955** dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 224 ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] ikyh ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 5-9-2002 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ¼2½ izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gSa fd oknh@izR;FkhZ la- 1 Hkokuhflag us ,d jktLo okn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88] 188 o 153 ds vUrxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ikyh ds U;k;ky; esa izfroknh@vihykFkhZa o izfroknh@izR;FkhZ la- 2 o 3 ds fo:) isk dj fuosnu fd;k fd xzke xqankst ds pd ua- 2 ds [kljk ua- 1151 jdck 15 ch?kk 18 fcLok ,oa [kljk ua- 1745 jdck 17 fcLok dqy jdck 16 ch?kk 15 fcLok Hkwfe fLFkr gS] tks Jherh /kudaoj csok Jh gjhflag jktiwr ds [kkrs esa ntZ jgh gSA Jherh /kudaoj dk LoxZokl o"kZ 1991 esa gks x;k rFkk muds ifr dk LoxZokl fnukad 15-8-75 dks gks pqdk gSA Jherh /kudaoj ds LoxZokl ds ipkr~ fookfnr —f"k Hkwfe ds mRrjkf/kdkjh oknh ,oa izfroknh la- 1 o 2 gq,A ysfdu Jherh /kudaoj ds LoxZokl ds ipkr~ izfroknh la- 1 }kjk QthZ olh;r rS;kj djok dj mDr oknxzLr —f"k Hkwfe dk ukekUrjdj.k vius uke ntZ djok fn;k] ftlls fxjnkojh muds uke ntZ gksus yxh] tcfd mDr fookfnr —f"k Hkwfe ij oknh ,oa izfroknh la- 1 o 2 dk leku dCtk dkr fcuk fdlh jksd Vksd ds pyk vk jgk gSA izfroknh la- 1 }kjk QthZ olh;r ds vk/kkj ij mld gd esa [kksys x, ukekUrj.k ds vk/kkj ij ,d okn fo:) oknh ,oa izfroknh la- 2 ds izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftlesa dksbZ fMØh ikfjr ugha gqbZ gSA orZeku [krkSuh ,oa [kljk fxjnkojh esa ek= izfroknh la- 1 dk fookfnr —f"k Hkwfe esa uke ntZ gksus ls dHkh Hkh buds }kjk gLrkUrj.k fd;k tk ldrk gSA vr% okn Lohdkj fd;k tkdj mDr fookfnr —f"k Hkwfe ds 1@3 fgLls dk [kkrsnkj oknh dks] 1@3 fgLls dk [kkrsnkj izfroknh la- s1 o ks"k 1@3 fgLls dk [kkrsnkj izfroknh la- 2 dks ?kksf"kr fd;k tk, rFkk izfriknh la- 1 ds fo:) bl vkk; dh LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ikfjr dh tkosa fd mDr fookfnr —f"k Hkwfe dk foHkktu ls iwoZ vius fgLls vFkok jktLo vfHkys[k ds vk/kkj ij lEiw.kZ Hkwfe dks fdlh vU; ds i{k esa gLrkarfjr ugha djsaA oknh }kjk izLrqr okn dk ijh{k.k U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 4-10-2000 dks ntZ fd;k tkdj izfroknh dks tfj;s uksfVl ryc fd;k x;kA izfroknh la- 1 }kjk ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa tokc nkok izLrqr dj okn ds rF;ksa ls bUdkj fd;k ,oa dgk fd izfroknh la- 3 dk fookfnr vkjkth ij dHkh Hkh dCtk ugha jgkA izfroknh la- 1 jsdkMsZM [kkrsnkj gS] ftlds fo:) fu"ks/kkKk ugha nh tk ldrhA LoxhZ; /kudaoj us izfroknh la-2 dk fgLlk ugha gM+ikA dksbZ okn dkj.k mRiUu ugha gqvk ,oa oknh }kkjk oknxzLr Hkwfe dks rhu fgLlksa esa foHkkftr djus dh ekax mfpr ughaa gSA blds vfrfjDr oknh }kjk pkgk x;k vuqrks"k rc rd ugha fn;k tk ldrk tc rd fd oknh l{ke U;k;ky; ls olh;r dks fujLr u djok ysA i{kdkjksa ds vfHkopuksa ds vk/kkj ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; us nknjlh lfgr 6 rufd;ksa dh fojpuk nhA oknh us nLrkosth lk{; ds vfrfjDr vius okn ds leFkZu esa ih- MCY;w 1 Hkokuhflag] ih- MCY;w- 2 eksguyky] ih- MCY;w- 3 jkeflag] ih- MCY;w- 4 jkbZax ds c;ku djok,aA izfroknh us nLrkosth lk{; ds vfrfjDr Mh- MCY;w 1 lqjsUnzflag ds c;ku djok,aA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 6-5-2002 }kjk oknh dk okn fMØh dj fn;kA mDr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 6-5-2002 ls vlarq"V gksdj izfroknh la- 1@vihykFkhZ us izFke vihy jktLO vihy vf/kdkjh] ikyh ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh] ftUgksaus muds fu.kZ; fnukad 5-9-2002 }kjk vihy vLohdkj dj nhA mDr fu.kZ; fnukad 5-9-2002 ls O;fFkr gksdj izfroknh la- 1@vihykFkhZ us ;g f}rh; vihy jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa isk dh gSA ¼3½ geus i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl lquhA ¼4½ fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk dFku gS fd izR;FkhZ us viuk nkok fl) djus ds fy, dksbZ jktLo vfHkys[k izLrqr ugha fd;kA izR;FkhZ us ;g fl) ugha fd;k fd fookfnr vkjkth iSr`d fdl izdkj gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us oknh dk okn ekSf[kd kgknr ds vk/kkj ij fMØh ij fof/kd =qfV dhA vius mijksDr dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 2001 i`"B 324 U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA fookfnr vkjkth ds fgLls rHkh fd, tk ldrs gS tcfd ;g fl) gks tk, fd fookfnr vkjkth iSr`d gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ljiap ds izek.k i= ds vk/kkj ij fooknkxzLr Hkwfe dks iSr`d lEifr ekudj fof/kd =qfV dhA olh;r ds vuqlkj fookfnr Hkwfe /kudaoj Lo;a dh FkhA izR;FkhZx.k dk dFku gS fd /kudaoj dh e`R;q ds ckn vihykFkhZ us QthZ olh;rukek rS;kj dj fookfnr vkjkth dk vius uke djok fy;k] ijUrq nkosa esa izR;FkhZ dk dFku gS fd fookfnr vkjkth iSr`d lEifr gS] ftlesa mudk fgLlk gSA izR;FkhZ us vfHkopuksa ls gVdj dFku fd;k] ftl ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; us izR;FkhZ dk okn fMØh dj fn;k] tks fof/k fo:) gSA vius mijksDr dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 1988 i`"B 143 U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA olh;r QthZ gS vFkok ugha] ;g fl) djus dk Hkkj izR;FkhZ ij Fkk] D;ksafd nkok ysdj izR;FkhZ vk;kA ijUrq fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ;g ckr vihykFkhZ ij Mky nh fd og ;g fl) djsa fd olh;r vlyh gS] fd U;k; ds izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ds foijhr gSA vius mijksDr dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 i`"B 73 o vkj-vkj-Mh- 1983 i`"B 67 U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk lgkjk fy;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ;g ekuk fd izkscsV tkjh djokuk vko;d gSA tcfd jktLFkku esa izkscsV tkjh djokuk vko;d ugha gS] tSlk fd 2002 vkj-vkj-Vh- ist 786 U;kf;d n`"VkUr esa izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gSA nkok isk djus ds iwoZ jkT; ljdkj dks /kkjk 80 lh-ih-lh- dk uksfVl ugha fn;k x;k gS tks fd vknskkRed gSA vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd oknxzLr Hkwfe ds laca/k esa olh;r fnukad 10-1-90 ds vk/kkj ij [kkrsnkjh dk ukekUrj.k vihykFkhZ ds uke xzke iapk;r xqankst us fnukad 9-8-95 dks ikfjr fd;k] mlds ipkr~ fookfnr vkjkth ds laca/k esa izR;FkhZ la- 2 [kqekuflag us jktLo okn la- 128@95 vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88 o 188 ds vUrxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ikyh ds U;k;ky; esa isk fd;k] ftls mUgksaus muds fu.kZ; fnukad 22-7-2000 }kjk [kkfjt dj fn;k] ftlds fo:) izR;FkhZ la- 2 xqekuflag us jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] ikyh ds le{k vihy izLrqr dh] ftls mUgksaus muds fu.kZ; fnukad 21-3-2001 }kjk Lohdkj dj i=koyh iqu% mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ikyh ds ;gkW izfrizsf"kr dj fu.kZ; ikfjr djus ds fy, funsZk fn,] og izdj.k mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ikyh ds U;k;ky; esa fopkj/khu gSA ml okn ds fopkjk/khu jgrs gq, izR;FkhZ la- 1 us jktLo okn i= la- 158@2000 mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] ikyh ds le{k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88] 53 ,oa 188 ds vUrxZr izLrqr dj fn;k tks fd ipkrorhZa okn i= gksus ds dkj.k /kkjk 10 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr iks"k.kh; ugha Fkk ,oa iwoZorhZ okn i= la- 128@95 ds vafre fu.kZ; gks tkus rd mls LFkfxr j[kuk pkfg, FkkA ijUrq nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us izR;FkhZ la- 1 }kjk izLrqr ipkrorhZa okn esa fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh iznku dj izFke n`"V;k =qfV dh gS] tks fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA izFke vihy U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; vknsk 41 fu;e 31 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds vuq:i ugha gSA ¼5½ fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZx.k dk dFku gS fd izR;FkhZ la- 1 us nkosa esa flQZ ;g dgk gS fd fookfnr vkjkth Jherh /kudaoj ds [kkrs esa ntZ FkhA /kudaoj dh e`R;q ds ipkr~ vihykFkhZ us fookfnr vkjkth tfj, QthZ olh;rukek vius uke djokdj ukekarj.k vius uke rLnhd djok fy;kA vihykFkhZa us vius tokcnkosa esa iwoZ esa izLrqr okn dk dksbZ mYys[k ugha fd;k] u izFke vihy esaA bl dkj.k bl fcUnq dks f}rh; vihy ds Lrj ij ugha mBk ldrsA izR;FkhZ ;g dgdj vk;s fd olh;r QthZ gS] bl dkj.k mlds vk/kkj ij tks bUnzkt fd;s x;s] os xyr gSA olh;r dks fl) djus dk Hkkj vihykFkhZ ij Fkk] ftls mlus fof/k }kjk izfrikfnr fl)karksa ds vuqlkj fl) ugha fd;kA vius mijksDr dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 1995 Mh-,u-ts- ¼2½ ¼jktLFkku½ 367] 2003 vkj-ch-ts- 544 U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk lgkjk fy;kA izR;FkhZa us olh;r fl) ugha dh] bl dkj.k og ,d kwU; nLrkost gS vkSj mlds vk/kkj ij jktLo bUnzkt fd, x;s] os fof/k fo:) gSA bl dkj.k nhokuh U;k;ky; esa olh;r dks fujLr djkus ds fy, pqukSfr nsus dh vko;drk ugha gSA bl dkj.k nhokuh U;k;ky; esa olh;r dks fujLr djkus ds fy, pqukSfr nsus dh vko;drk ugha gSA /kkjk 80 lh-ih-lh- ds uksfVl dk ,srjkt vihykFkhZ us viuh vihy ds eheks esa ugha fd;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds leorhZ fu"d"kZ gS ftuesa f}rh; vihy ds Lrj ij gLr{ksi ugha fd;k tk ldrk] vr% vihykFkhZ dh vihy fujLr dh tk,A ¼6½ geusa i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk fn;s x;s rdksaZa ij euu fd;k o i=koyh ij miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA ¼7½ tgkW rd vihykFkhZ dk ;g dFku gS fd izR;FkhZ la- 2 us okn isk fd;k] og vHkh fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa py jgk gS] bl dkj.k izuxr vihy dks ml okn ds QSlys rd /kkjk 10 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr~ LFkfxr dj fn;k tkosaA ge vihykFkhZ ds bl dFku ls lger ugha gS] D;ksafd ipkrorhZ eqdnek vHkh fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa yfEcr ugha gS] oju~ mldk fuLrkj.k fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 6-5-2002 dks gh gks x;kA vihykFkhZ fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k bl fcUnq dks mBk ldrk FkkA ipkrorhZ okn dk fu.kZ; gks tkus ds ipkr~ gekjh lqfopkkfjr jk; esa vihykFkhZ izuxr izdj.k esa vihy ds Lrj ij ml fcUnq dks ugha mBk ldrkA ¼8½ vihykFkhZ dk ;g rdZ fd izR;FkhZ la- 1 us /kkjk 80 lh-ih-lh- dk uksfVl jkT; ljdkj dks ugha fn;k] bl dkj.k nkok pyus ;ksX; ugha Fkk] ls ge lger ugha gS&dkj.k /kkjk 80 lh-ih-lh- ds uksfVl ugha nsus dh vkifRr og O;fDr mBk ldrk gS tks mlls izHkkfor gksrk gSA izuxr uksfVl esa rglhynkj i{kdkj gSA izR;FkhZ la- 3 us bl laca/k esa dksbZ vkifRr ugha mBkbZA ukFkw cuke prjk o vU; vkj-vkj-Mh- 1999 i`"B 577 esa jktLo e.My dh ,dy ihB us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "Code of Civil Procedure, Section 80—Suit dismissed due to absence of notice by Trial Court—Revision—Held relief has been claimed against deft. No. 1 to 6 and not against Tehsildar—Absence of notice u/s 80, CPC to Tehsildar, held not fatal—Objection can be raised by Tehsildar only and not by others—Order, set aside—Directions issued for disposal to Trial Court—Case remanded." ¼9½ ge vihykFkhZ ds bl dFku ls lger gS fd jktLFkku esa izkscsV ysuk vko;d ugha gSA tgka rd izkscsV dk izu gS vkj-vkj-Mh- 1986 ist 135 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd%& "Will—not required to be probated in Raj. where will executed by a person, resident in Raj.—A.I.R. 1959 Raj. where will executed by a person, resident in Raj.—A.I.R. 1959 Raj. 243 R.L.W. 374, referred." ¼10½ vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDRkk dk dFku gS fd olh;e QthZ gS] bl ckr dk fuLrkj.k flfoy U;k;ky; gh dj ldrk gS u fd jktLo U;k;ky;A izuxr izdj.k esa eq[; vuqrks"k izR;FkhZ la- 1 }kjk nkosa esa pkgk x;k gS og gS fd fookfnr vkjkth dk 1@3 fgLls dk oknh dks ,oa izfroknh la- 1 dks 1@3 fgLls dk rFkk ks"k 1@3 fgLls dk izfroknh la- 3 dk ekSds ij vyx&vyx fgLlksa esa foHkkftr dj jktLo fjdkMZ esa mDr fgLlksa dk ukekUrj.k djok;k tkosa rFkk jktLo jkfk cjkcj rhu fgLlksa esa foHkkftr dh tkosaA vfHkys[k ds ns[kus ls Li"V gS fd izR;FkhZ us vius nkosa esa dgk ^^izfroknh la- 1 ls Jherh /kudaoj dh e`R;q ds ipkr~ cnf~u;rh ls ,d QthZ olh;rukek rS;kj djok;k rFkk mlds vk/kkj ij okn i= la- 1 esa of.kZr —f"k Hkwfe dk ukekUrj.k vdsys Lo;a ds uke ij ntZ djok fn;k rFkk oknh ,oa izfroknh la- 2 dks vius mRrjkf/kdkj ds dkuwuh vf/kdkjksa ls oafpr dj fn;k tc fd mDr —f"k Hkwfe esa oknh ,oa izfroknh la- 1 o 2 dks leku fgLlk 1@3 izR;sd dks mRrjkf/kdkj ds tfj, izkIr gksrk gSA bl dkj.k ;g okn mDr xyr o QthZ olh;r ds vk/kkj ij ukekUrj.k ls lEiw.kZ tehu dks viuh [kkrsnkjh esa ntZ djk nsus ds fo:) ;g okn okLrs ?kks"k.kk [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj ds izLrqr fd;k tk jgk gS] ftlds fy, dksbZ vof/k ck/kk ughaA** olh;r dks fl) djus dk Hkkj olh;r izkIrdrkZ ij gqvk gSA tc olh;r lakkRed ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fxjh gks rks mls fl) djus dk Hkkj izkIrdrkZ ij gS fd mldh O;k[;k djsa vkSj U;k;ky; ds vUr%dj.k dks larq"V djsaA ekuuh; mPPre U;k;ky; us Sridevi and Others vs. Jayaraja Shretty and others 2005 ¼1½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼,l-lh-½ 110 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "It is well settled proposition of law that mode of proving the Will does not differ from that of proving any other document except as to the special requirement of attestation prescribed in the case of a Will by section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The onus to prove the Will is on the propounder and in the absence of suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the Will, proof of testamentary capacity and proof of the signature of the testator, as required by law, need be sufficient to discharge the onus, Where these are suspicious circumstances, the onus would again be on the propounder to explain them to the satisfaction of the Court before the Will can be accepted as genuine Proof in either case cannot be mathematically precise and certain and should be one of satisfaction of prudent mind in such matters. In case the person contesting the Will alleges under influence, fraud or coerction, the onus will be on him to prove the same. As to what are suspicious circumstances have to be judged in the facts and circumstances of each particular case." vihykFkhZ us olh;r dks fl) ugha fd;kA mijksDr ls Li"V gS fd ;s ,sls vuqrks"k gS fd tks jktLo U;k;ky;ksa }kjk gh fn, tk ldrs gS] blds fy, ;g vko;d ugha gS fd olh;r dks kwU; ?kksf"kr fd;k tkosaA ¼11½ ukekUrj.k ls dksbZ fof/kd vf/kdkj fdlh ds i{k esa mRiUu ugha gksrs] ;g dsoy ,d fQLdy izkslsfMax gSA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;y; us ¼1996½ 6 ,l-lh-lh- ist 223 esa ukekUrj.k ds laca/k esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "Mutation of a property in the revenue record does not create or extinguish title not has it any presumptive value of title. It only enables the person, in whose favour the mutation is entered, to pay the land revenue in question." ¼12½ izFke vihy U;k;ky; us izR;sd fcUnq ij fopkj djus ds ckn fu.kZ; iznku fd;k gS] vr% ;g dguk gS fd izFke vihy U;k;ky; us vknsk 41 fu;e 31 lh-ih-lh- dh vogsyuk dh gS vkSj rudhokj QSlyk ugha fn;k] lgh ugha ekuk tk ldrkA vihy U;k;ky; us muds le{k tks fcUnq cgl esa mBk;ss x;s] mu ij fu.kZ; iznku fd;k gSA ;fn fdlh fcUnq ij fu.kZ; ugha fn;k tkrk rks O;fFkr i{k dks mlh U;k;ky; esa utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= isk djuk pkfg;sA ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us ghjkyky iq[kjkt ,.M vnlZ cuke izsefdku] vkj-,y-MCY;w- 2004 ¼4½ jkt- 2358 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& (a) C.P.C. Order 41, Rule 31 read with Sec. 96—Consideration of evidence of the parties in first appeal—Held, When appellate Court agreed with the view of Trial Court on evidence it need not restate it need not restate effect of evidence or reiterate reason given by the Trail Court." ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ,e uMkj dsou uMkj cuke ukjk;.k uMkj dqatu uMkj ¼2000½ 9 ,-lh-lh- 244 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Sec. 100—High Courts interference with concurrent findings of fact in second appeal when not justified—Both Trail Court and first appellate court coming to a definite conclusion on the basis of evidence on record that respondents had failed to establish by positive evidence that their possession of disputed property was hostile to the real owner and in denial of his title and thus they failed to prove that they perfected their title by adverse possession—Thus respondents failed to discharge the burden of proof which was on them—Held, even if the concurrent finding of fact was wrong, High Court erred in disturbing the same when it had not found that the same was not perverse nor was based on no evidence." ¼13½ mijksDr foospu ds ifj.kkeLo:i gekjs erkuqlkj bl ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izR;FkhZ nkosa dks lgh izdkj ls fMØh fd;k gSA vr% vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vihy lkjghu gksus ds dkj.k [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA ¼14½ fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA