iqjkfgr] lnL; & ;g vihy /kkjk 225 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ ds varxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] ikyh }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-9-96 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ftlds }kjk mUgksaus vihy la[;k 31@95 esa vihy Lohdkj dj lgk;d ftyk/khk] nslwjh dk fu.kZ; fujLr dj izdj.k dks izfrizsf"kr fd;k gSA 2- orZeku jsLiksaMs.V-oknh us ,d jktLo okn ^vf/kfu;e* dh /kkjk 88] 89 ds rgr lgk;d dysDVj] nslwjh ds le{k izLrqr fd;kA mDr okn dks lgk;d dysDVj] nwljh us lquokbZ ds ckn vius fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh fnukad 31-1-89 }kjk vLohdkj dj fn;kA mDr fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh ds fo:) orZeku jsLiksaMs.V us vihy jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] ikyh ds le{k izLrqr dh ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 17-9-96 ds }kjk vakr% Lohdkj dj lgk;d ftyk/khk ds fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh fnukad 31-1-89 dks fujLr dj izdj.k dks izfrizsf"kr fd;kA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds mDr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-6-96 ds fo:) ;g f}rh; vihy izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- bl vihy dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 17-10-97 dks xzg.k dj jsLiksaMs.V dks lk/kkj.k uksfVl tkjh fd;s x;s ftl ij rkehy ugha gksus ij bl U;k;ky; us vihyk.V dks jsLiksaMs.V ds jftLVMZ ,-Mh- uksfVl isk djus ds vknsk fn;sA jftLVMZ ,-Mh- uksfVl isk ugha gksus ij tkjh fd;s x;s tks vne rkehy ykSV dj okfil vk;sA fnukad 18-9-2002 dks bl U;k;ky; us vihyk.V ds izkFkZuk i= ij vknsk ikfjr fd;k fd jsLiksaMs.V dh rkehy ugha gks jgh gS blfy, nSfud uoT;ksfr lekpkj i= tks/kiqj laLdj.k esa uksfVl lk;k fd;k tkosA bl vknsk ds rgr jsLiksaMs.V ds uksfVl v[kckj esa lk;k djok dj lekpkj i= dh izfr isk dh xbZA bl izdkj jsLiksaMs.V ij lCLVhV~;wV rkehy djkbZ ysfdu ckotwn rkehy ds jsLiksaMs.V dh vuqifLFkr jgus ij mldh vuqifLFkfr esa vihy dh lquokbZ dh xbZA vihykaV ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk bl okn esa okni= ,oa tokcnkos ds vk/kkj ij rudh;kr dk;e dj rudh;kr ij lk{;ksa dks ysdj okn dk fu.kZ; fd;k gS ftlds fo:) vihy esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izdj.k dks cxSj fdlh Bksl vk/kkj ij fjek.M dj fn;k gS] tks fof/k vuq:i vknsk ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd bl izdj.k esa vko;d lk{; i=koyh ij ekStwn gksrs gq, Hkh jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us izdj.k dks miyC/k lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij iqu% fu.kZ; fy[kus gsrq izdj.k dks izfrizsf"kr fd;k gS tks lh-ih-lh- esa bl ckcr~ izko/kku vkMZj 41 :y 24 ds fo:) gSA jsLiksaMs.V ckotwn rkehy ds u rks Lo;a mifLFkr gS] u mldh vksj ls dksbZ vfHkHkk"kd ekStwn gSA jsLiksaMs.V dks vkokt fnykbZ xbZA 4- geusa vihykaV ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd ds rdZ lqusA mu ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 5- vihyk/khu vknsk ds voyksdu djus ij vknsk ds iSjk uacj 4 ds vafre iSjs esa fo}ku jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us lgk;d dysDVj] nslwjh ds fu.kZ; fnukad 31-1-89 dks fujLr dj i=koyh lgk;d dysDVj] nslwjh dks bl funsZk ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr dh gS fd i=koyh ij miyC/k nLrkost ,oa kgknr iqu% fopkj dj fu;ekuqlkj fu.kZ; ikfjr djsaA bl vknsk esa ;g dgh ugh dgk gS fd i=koyh esa fu.kZ; gsrq vko;d kgknr ,oa nLrkost izLrqr djus dk volj nsrs gq, mu ij fopkj dj fu.kZ; ikfjr djsa cfYd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us i=koyh ij miyC/k nLrkost ,oa kgknr dks fu.kZ; gsrq dkQh ¼sufficient½ ekurs gq, Hkh mUgha nLrkost ,oa kgknr ij iqu% fopkj dj iqu% fu.kZ; djus dk vknsk fn;k gSA 6- bl laca/k esa lh-ih-lh- ds vksMZj 41 fu;e 23] 23,] 24 ,oa 25 esa tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS] og bl izdkj gS& 1. Rule 23 - Remand of case by Appellate Court - "Where the Court from whose decree an appeal is preferred has disposed of the suit upon a preliminary point and the decree is reversed in appeal, the Appellate Court may, if it thinks fit, by other remand case, and may further direct what issues shall be tried in the case so remanded, and shall send a copy of its judgment and order to the Court form whose decree the appeal is preferred, with direction to re-admit the suit under its original number in the register of civil suits, and proceed to determine the suit; and the evidence (if any) recorded during the original trial shall, subject to all just exceptions, be evidence during the trial after remand." [Rule 23-A Remand order cases: — Where the Court from whose decree and appeal is preferred has disposed of the case otherwise than on a preliminary point, and the decree is reversed in appeal and a re-trial is considered necessary, the Appellate Court shall have the same powers as it has under Rule 23]. Rule 24: Where evidence on record sufficient, Appellate Court may determine case finally - Where the evidence upon the record is sufficient to enable the Appellate Court to pronounce judgment, the Appellate Court may, after resetting the issues, if necessary, finally determine the suit, notwithstanding that the judgment of the Court from whose decree the appeal is preferred has proceeded wholly upon sortie ground other than that on which the Appellate Court proceeds. Rule 25 : Where Appellate Court may frame issues and refer them for trial to Court whose decree appealed from - Where the Court whose decree the appeal is preferred has omitted to frame or try any issue, or to determine any question of fact, which appears to the Appellate Court essential to the right decision of the suit upon the merits, the Appellate Court may, if necessary, frame issues, and refer the same for trial to the Court from whose decree the appeal is preferred and in such case shall direct such Court to take the additional evidence required; and such Court shall proceed to try such issues, and shall return the evidence to the Appellate Court together with its findings thereon and the reasons therefor [within such time as may be fixed by the Appellate Court or extended by it from time to time.]. 7- mDr izko/kkuksa ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd ftl izdj.k esa i=koyh o vko;d nLrkosth ,oa vU; kgknr ekStwn gks ml izdj.k dks izfrizsf"kr djus ds ctk; U;k;ky; dks Lo;a gh fu.kZ; dj nsuk pkfg;s ysfdu izLrqr izdj.k esa jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us ftu nLrkostksa ,oa kgknr ij lgk;d dysDVj us fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS mlesa [kkfe;ka crkrs gq, mUgha nLrkost dh kgknr ij iqu% fopkj djus dk tks vknsk fn;k gS Li"V :i ls bl izdkj dk fd;k x;k fjU;w vkMZj voS/kkfud fjek.M vksMZj gSA bl laca/k esa fuEukafdr fofup; mYys[kuh; gS& ¼1½ ^deyskdqekj cuke eaxykjke o vU;* 1924 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 353 ds fofup; esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB }kjk tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS] og bl izdkj gS% "Code of Civil Procedure, Order 41, Rules 23, 23A, 25 - Suit for division of holding - Adoption of appellant in second appeal by original plaintiff (deceased) not an issue before trial Court -Her share in land not disputed - First Appellate Court should not have remanded case to trial Court for examining validity of adopt: on which was by a registered deed - Parties aggrieved of the adoption should have challenged it in competent Court." ¼2½ ^vfouh dqekj ds- iVsy cuke misUnz ts- iVsy o vU;* vkj-ch-ts- 1999 ist 390 ds fofup; esa ekuuh; lqizhe dksVZ }kjk tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS] og bl izdkj gS% "Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 41 Rule 23 - Remand -High Court should not remand the case merely because it considered the reasoning of the lower court in some respects Was wrong - The High Court should not ordinarily remand a case u/O. 41 R. 23 CPC to the lower Court merely because it considered the reasoning of the lower court in some respects Was wrong. Such remand orders lead to unnecessary delays and cause prejudice to the parties to the case. When the material was available before the High Court, it should have itself decided the appeal one way or other. It could have considered the various aspects of the case mentioned whether the order of the trial Court ought to be confirmed or reversed or modified. It could have easily considered the documents and affidavits and decided about the prima facie case on the material available. It could have considered the various aspects of the case mentioned whether the order of the trial Court ought to be confirmed or reversed or modified. It could have easily considered the documents and affidavits and decided about the prima facie case on the material available. In matters involving agreements of 1980 (and 1996) on the hand and an agreement of 1991 on the other, as in this case, such remand orders would lead to further delay and uncertainty. We are, therefore, of the view that the remand by the High Court was not necessary." ¼3½ Mst. Baijanti & Orhers vs. Bhagwati Prasad & Others R.R.D. 193 P. 232 ds fofup; esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB }kjk tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS] og bl izdkj gS% "(c) Order 41, Rule 24 — Evidence upon the record should have finally determined the suit." ¼4½ "Nathu Singh vs. Banna" R.R.D. 1961 P. 193 ds fofup; esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB }kjk tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS] og bl izdkj gS& ¼5½ "Rampayari vs. Mysukh" R.R.D. 1999 P. 397 ds fofup; esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB }kjk tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS] og bl izdkj gS& "Code of Civil Procedure, Order 41, Rules 23 & 27 - Second Appeal against order of dismissal of suit by trial Court - Case demanded by R.A.A. in appeal - Second appeal - Held, cordial principle is to decide the case on the basis of evidence led by Parties, documents produced in evidence and material available On record — It is not the duty or privilege of the court to lead Evidence without any prayer of the parties or remand the case Without framing new issue or without porting incomplete Evidence - Order of R.A.A. held without jurisdiction and set aside - Case remanded for disposal on merits." ¼6½ Smt. Gulab Bai vs. Makhan Lal & Orhters" R.R.D. 1991 P. 516 ds fofup; esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB }kjk tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS] og bl izdkj gS% "(f) Civil Procedure code, Order 41, Rule 24 — Evidence on record sufficient to enable appellate Court to pronounce judgment — Appellate Court was duty — bound to decide appeal on evidence on record and it committed an illegality in remanding case." ¼7½ "K. Krishna Reddy & Others vs. The Special Dy. Collector, Land Acquisition Unit-II LMD Karimganar Andhra Pradesh" ds fofup; ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1988 ,llh ist 2123 esa ek- lqizhe dksVZ ¼vka/kz iznsk½ }kjk tks O;oLFkk nh xbZ gS] og bl izdkj gS% "Land Acquisition Act (1994), S. 23 - Compensation -Determination - Appellate Courts power to order remand -Not to be exercised lightly and unless evidence is totally lacking - Awards should be passed speedily Appeals Nos. 2578-83 of 1985 dt/- 30.12.1985 (A.P.) Reversed. (Civil P.C. (1908), O.43 Rr. 23, 23A) (Appellate Court — Land Acquisition Award — Interference.) The District Judge on reference enhanced the rate of compensation taking into consideration the situation of the lands, the report of the local Commissioner and the awards given in respect of other lands in that area. The High Court brushed aside all that evidence and remanded the case. Held that the appellate power of remand ought not to be exercised lightly. It shall not be restored to unless the award is wholly unintelligible. It shall not be exercised unless there is total lock of evidence. If remand is imperative and if the claim for enhanced compensation is tenable, it would be proper for the appellate court to do modest best to mitigate hardships. It shall not be restored to unless the award is wholly unintelligible. It shall not be exercised unless there is total lock of evidence. If remand is imperative and if the claim for enhanced compensation is tenable, it would be proper for the appellate court to do modest best to mitigate hardships. The appellate court may direct some interim payment to claimants subject to adjustment in the eventual award." mijksDr m)r uthjksa ds vykok 1994 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 135-ch ,oa 179,] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2002 ,llh ist 771] ,-vkbZ-vkj- ,llh ist 351] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2003 enzkl ist 56] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1999 ,llh dSlst ¼3½ ist 161 ,oa 2001 vkj-ch-ts- ist 135 ds fofup;ksa esa Hkh ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd tgka izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; ds le{k nksuksa i{kdkjksa dh vksj ls izLrqr dh xbZ lk{; equkflc ¼sufficient½ gks rks ,sls ekeys esa izdj.k dks iqu% fu.kZ; gsrq fjek.M fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 8- fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ,oa mijksDr uthjksa ds v/;;u ds mijkar izLrqr izdj.k esa tks fjek.M dk fu.kZ; jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] ikyh }kjk ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] og oS/kkfud ugha gSA 9- mijksDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij ;g f}rh; vihy vkafkd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s cxSj jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] ikyh }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-9-96 dks fujLr dj ;g izdj.k mUgsa bl funsZk ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd os mijksDr uthjksa o fof/k ds izko/kkuksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, i=koyh ij ekStwn lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij Lo;a vihy dk xq.kkxq.k ij fof/kor% fu.kZ; ikfjr djsaA 10- i{kdkjku U;k;ky; jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] ikyh ds le{k fnukad 28-1-05 dks mifLFkr gksoasA 11- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA