Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2005 DIGILAW 2480 (RAJ)
Nathu Lal v. State of Rajasthan
2005-09-16
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
body2005
Judgment fko dqekj kekZ, U;k;k/khk-izfri{khx.k@jkT; ljdkj dks fnukad&25-06-2004 dks fjV ;kfpdk ds uksfVl tkjh fd, x;s Fks] ftudh lwpuk izfri{khx.k dks fnukad&08-07-2004 dks gks pqdh Fkh] fdUrq vHkh rd izfri{khx.k dh vksj r ugh fd;k x;k gSaA bl rF; dks /;ku esqls fjV ;kfpdk mRrj izLrqa j[krs gq, fd izkFkhZ dh fu; fDr 16-09-1989 j mldh lssdks prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh ds in ij gqbZ Fkh vkSok;a izfri{khx.k }kjk vknsk fnukad&10-06-2004 }kjk lekIr dj nh xbZ] izfri{khx.k dks fjV ;kfpdk dk mRrj izLrqr djus dk vkSj volj fn;k tkuk eSa] mfpr ugha le>rk vr% izfri{khx.k dk mRrj cUn fd;k tkrk gSaA r rdksZa dks vk|ksr lq 2-mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf /koDrkx.k }kjk izLrqikauk x;k rFkk vfHkys[k dk xgurk ls ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA 3-vk{ksq fir vknsk fnukad&10-06-2004 ds vuqkhyu ls Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ dh fu; fDr prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh ds in ij jkT; lSfud cksMZ] t;iqj esa vknsk fnukad&16-09-1989 }kjk vLFkkbZ rkSj ij dh xbZ Fkh vkSj mldh lsok;a qc<+kbZ tkrh jgh FkhaA izkFkhZ dh fu;fDr dks fu;fer djus ds lEcU/k easjkT; ljdkj ds ikl izLrko Hksts tkus ij jkT; ljdkj us izkFkhZ dh fu; fDr dks vfu;fer ekurs gq, izkFkhZ dh lssqok;a lekIr djus ds funsZk ns fn, ,oa jkT; k fnukad 12-05-2004 dh vuqikyuk esa izkFkhZ dh lssj }kjk ljdkj ds vknsok;a lSfud dY;k.k foHkkx] jktLFkku] t;iqwork for a considerable length of time, it would be hard and harsh to deny them the confirmation in the respective posts on the ground that they lack the prescribed educational, qualifications.” 5-mDr U;kf ;d n`"VkUr esa mPpre U;k;ky; ds ekuuh; U;k;kf /kifrx.k }kjk fn, x;s mDr funsZkksa ds[ 2005 DIGILAW 2480 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]