JUDGMENT 1. - This criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (for short, "the Code") is directed against the judgment dated 28.7.2005 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Udaipur (for short, "the Family Court" hereinafter) in Case No. 915 of 2003, whereby Family Court allowed the application filed by the respondent under Section 125 of the Code and awarded maintenance @ Rs. 500/- per month in favour of respondents No. 1 Smt. Lalita, the wife, and Rs. 300/-per month in favour of respondent No. 2 Bhavesh, the son of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the order impugned, the petitioner has filed the instant revision petition. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order impugned. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has shown me the pay slip for the month of July 2005 in respect of the petitioner. Petitioner is a permanent employee of Northern Railway and his monthly salary is Rs. 4913/-. Apart from the salary, the respondent No. 1 has stated that the petitioner is undertaking the work of repairing of television and tape-records etc., by which he earns Rs. 1500/- per month. 4. Be that as iit may, the admitted-income of the petitioner is Rs. 4,913/- per month out of which a sum of Rs. 800/- per month in all has been awarded as maintenance for two persons, i.e., respondents No. 1 and 2. Keeping is view the market inflation, the amount of Rs. 800/- per month for maintaining two persons cannot be said to be excessive. It is not disputed that the respondent No. 1 is the legally wedded wife and respondent No. 2 is the son born out of the wedlock of the petitioner and respondent No. 1. In the circumstances, therefore, I do not find any error, illegality or perversity in the order impugned. 5. The revision petition is dismissed. The stay petition also stands dismissed.Revision Petition dismissed. *******