JUDGMENT 1. - Since these two bail application pertain to and arise out of the same F.I.R. No. 179/2005 P.S. Kotwali, Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 382 and 395 IPC, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. It is contended that co-accused Hanuman Prasad and Liyakat Ali have already been admitted to bail in this case by this Court vide order dated 3.8.2005 and the petitioners have been falsely roped in this case. They have also submitted that challan has since been filed and the petitioners have neither been named in the first information report nor any test identification parade has been got conducted by the witnesses. 3. Learned PP has opposed the bail application. He has submitted that recovery of a gold-chain and nose-pin have been made from their possession, which indicates their involvement in the alleged offences. 4. Having considered the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case particularly the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been admitted to bail, the petitioner also deserves the same treatment. 5. In the result, these bail applications u/s. 439 Cr.PC. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Dharamveer son of Shri Lokram and Prabhu Singh son of Shri Bahadur Singh shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for their appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial.Bail application allowed. *******