Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2005 DIGILAW 2707 (RAJ)
Mangu Ram (D) thr. LRs. v. Ganpat
2005-10-18
M.S.KHAN
body2005
[kku] lnL; & ;g fuxjkuh ftyk dsyDVj Jh xaxkuxj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 6-5-96 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 x.kir us rglhynkj lknqykgj ds le{k isk fd;k rFkk ,d izkFkZuk i= vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 212¼1½ ds vUrxZr isk dj fuosnu fd;k fd izkFkhZ pd 15 ch ,u MCY;w esa eqrjkdk [kkrk dqy 760 fgLlk esa ls 127 fgLlk ¼6 ch?kk 7 fcLok½ ugjh tehu gS ftldk izkFkhZ ekfyd gS rFk tehu dk bUrdky Hkh izkFkhZ ds uke jktLo jsdkMZ esa [kkrsnkj dkrdkj ntZ gS ftldh djhc vkB o"kZ iwoZ viuh mDr tehu vizkFkhZ dks izfro"kZ ds fgLkkc ls r;kqnk Bsdk dh jde le; ij vnk okil ys ysxkA vizkFkhZ igys rks eqrkfcd krZ izkFkhZ dks r;kqnk Bsdk dh jde le; ij vnk djrk jgkk] ijUrq fiNys o"kZ vizkFkhZ us r;kqnk Bsdk dh jde ckj&ckj ekWaxus ij Hkh vnk ugh dhA ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dh tehu ij fjlhoj fu;qDr fd;k tkosA vizkFkhZ i{k dh vksj ls tokc izLrqr gksus ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lqudj rghlynkj us vius vknsk fnukad 15-11-95 ds }kjk fooknxzLr vkjkth ij fxjnkoj lfdZy dks fjlhoj fu;qDr dj fn;kA blls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZ ekWxwjke us ftyk dsyDVj ds U;k;ky; esas vihy nk;j dh ftUgksus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 6-5-96 }kjk vihy [kkfjt dj nhA blls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh e.My ds le{k isk dh xbZ gSA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k dh /kkjk 183 dk ewy vkosnu rglhynkj ds ikl vfUre fu.kZ; gsrq fopkjk/khu gS fdUrq rglhynkj }kjk mDr izkFkZuk i= dk vfUre fuLrkj.k ugh dj Hkwfe dks fjlhoj esa nsus ds vknsk iznku dj fn;s gsA bl izdj.k esa vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr x.kir }kjk ekWxwjke dks Hkwfe dk fodz; dj fn;k x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa bl lEcU/k esa jkT; ljdkj dks /kkjk 175 ds rgr dk;Zokgh izkjEHk djuh pkfg;s Fkh rkfd mDr Hkwfe jkT; ljdkj esa fufgr gks ldsA mUgksus ;g Hkh dFku fd;k fd /kkjk 183ch ds rgr dk;Zokgh djus gsrq 12 lky dh le; lhek fu/kkZfjr gS tcfd /kkjk 183 ds rgr ;g izdj.k 38 o"kZ ckn ntZ gqvk gSA mUgksus ;g Hkh dFku fd;k fd jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 63 lc Dykt 4 o 7 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr dh [kkrsnkjh foyksfir gks pqdh gSA mUgksus ;g Hkh dFku fd;k fd rglhynkj }kjk fjlhoj xyr fu;qDr fd;k x;k gS D;ksfd izkFkhZ ijpstj gS Vsªliklj ughA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa vkjvkjMh 1995 ist 463] vkjvkjMh 1994 ist 571] vkjvkjMh 1993 ist 272] 513 vkjvkjVh 2003 ikVZ 1 ist 207 vkjvkjMh 1988 ist 112] vkjvkjMh 2002 ist 47 dh uthjs isk dhA 5- vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl es crk;k fd vizkFkhZ dks Hkh bl izdj.k esa i{kdkj cuk;k tkuk pkfg;s FkkA D;ksafd og vuqlwfpr tkfr dk O;fDr gSA mUgksus ;g Hkh dFku fd;k dh muds }kjk dksbZ Hkwfe dk cspku ugh fd;k x;k gSA blfy, rglhynkj }kjk fjlhoj lgh fu;qDr fd;k x;k gSA mudk dFku gS fd lekt ds detksj rcds ds yksxksa ds fgrksa dks laj{k.k iznku djus ds fy, U;k;ky;ksa dks foks"k /;ku nsuk pkfg;sA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa mUgksus vkjvkjMh 1970 ist 483] vkjvkjMh 1976 ist 18 dh uthjsa isk dhA 6- jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k gS fd bl izdj.k esa fjlhoj fu;qDr djuk dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj lgh gSA D;ksfd vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr dh Hkwfe dk jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 42 ds foifjr gLrkUrj.k gksuk ik;k x;k gSA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa vkjvkjMh 1976 ist 18] vkjvkjMh 1986 ist 55] 547] vkjvkjMh 1979 ist 207 dh uthjs isk dhA 7- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 8- izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk tks rdZ ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkar vius i{k ds leFkZu esa izLrqr fd;s x;s gS muls ge bl izdj.k ds foks"k rF;ksa ds ifjizs{; esa lger ugh gSA D;ksafd ;g fufoZokn :i ls lgh gS fd fooknxzLr Hkwfe vuqlwfpr tkfr d O;fDr dh Hkwfe Fkh ftldk izkFkhZ }kjk dz; fd;k tkuk crk;k x;k gS tcfd vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 x.kir dk dFku gS fd mlds ;k mld iwoZtksa us dksbZ Hkwfe fodz; ugh dh gSA bl dkj.k mlds }kjk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 183 ch dh dk;Zokgh gsrq rglhynkj dks vkosnu izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr dh Hkwfe gksus ds dkj.k U;k;ky; dk ;g nkf;Ro curk gS fd og lekt ds detksj rcds ds O;fDr;ksa dks i;kZIr laj{k.k iznku djsA bl lEcU/k esa vkjvkjMh 1970 ist 483 (supra) ess dgk x;k gS fd & Rajasthan Tenancy Act, Sec. 212 - Scope - Order appointing receiver passed ex parte by Trial Court in suit under Sec. 183, confirmed after hearing parties -R.A.A. in appeal reversed order - Propriety - Held that Trial Court, justified in not relying upon khasra girdawari entries in favour of debts, as such entires not created any title or right in property, and where suit lands admittedly in Khatedari of plaintiff applicant - Appointing of receiver within discretionary powers of Trial Courts on consideration of equity and justice - Appointment of receiver held justified despite non fulfillment of condition stipulated in Sec. 212 - Power of Trial Court to appoint receiver, not restricted by Sec. 212 irrespective of conditions laid down therein, fulfilled or not - Order of R.A.A. set aside.
blh izdkj vkjvkjMh 1976 ist 18 esa Hkh ;g fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k x;k gS fd & Raj. Tenancy Act, Sec. 212 - Appt. of receiver - Whether unlawful possession cannot be disturbed - Injunction can be issued by Court even in exercise of its jurisdiction as held in AIR 1962 SC 527 - Same principle, applicable to appt. of receiver - Such appt. of receiver, upheld by Board in several cases even where property, not alleged to be in danger of being wasted etc. -Observation in 1974 RRD 475 that even unlawful possession cannot be disturbed till disposal of suit, held obiter dicta - Possession of rank trespasser cannot be upheld until end of suit which may take several years because that would mean putting a premium on lawlessness - For possession to be protected there must be an element of legitimacy - Where ptff. was khatedar and defts. took advantage of the fact that she was a widow and tried to dispossess her, appt. of receiver to protect a weak party with a prima facie title from aggressive designs, held perfectly justified - Courts are to do justice and in interlocutory proceedings when prima facie case and balance of convenience heavily in favour of one party, order must be passed protecting effectively its interests. ;gkWa ;g rF; foks"k :i ls mYys[kuh; gS fd rglyhnkj 183ch ds vkosnu ij vHkh vfUre :i ls fu.kZ; ikfjr ugh fd;k gS vkSj Hkwfe vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr dh gksus ds dkj.k fjlhoj fu;qDr djus ds gh vknsk fn;s gS tks fd gekjh jk; esa mijksDr of.kZr dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA 9- vr% mijksDr of.kZr rF;ksa ,oa dkuwuh izko/kkuksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s ;g fuxjkuh [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA ftyk dysDVj Jhxaxkuxj dk vknsk fnukad 6-5-96 ,oa rglhynkj lknqykgj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 15-11-95 dks ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2005 DIGILAW 2707 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]